Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Spring Rice and Wheat Stubble Rice in Tianjin

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.06.022

China Rice ›› 2021, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 112-114.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.06.022

• Varieties & Technology • Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Spring Rice and Wheat Stubble Rice in Tianjin

Fei ZHAO, Jian LIU^*(), Jin DU, Gaoyi CAO, Chunyang XIANG, Xiuru WU, Yakun YANG

College of Agronomy & Resources and Environment, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin 300384, China

Received:2021-06-18 Online:2021-11-20 Published:2021-11-20
Contact: Jian LIU

天津春稻和麦茬稻品质特性比较

赵飞, 刘建^*(), 杜锦, 曹高燚, 向春阳, 吴秀茹, 杨娅坤

天津农学院农学与资源环境学院,天津 300384

通讯作者: 刘建
基金资助:
天津市科学技术局农村科技帮扶工程项目（18ZXBFNC00300;19ZXBTSN00160）;天津市武清区科技计划项目（WQKJ20193）

Abstract

Abstract:

The differences of quality characteristics between spring and wheat stubble rice were analyzed for Jinchuan 1 and Longyou 619 varieties. The results showed that the whole rice rate and the palatability score of Jinchuan 1 as wheat stubble rice were significantly lower than that as spring rice, the chalky grain rate and the protein content were significantly higher than that as spring rice. For Longyou 619, there was no significant difference in appearance, processing, palatability and nutritional quality between spring rice and wheat stubble rice, it was an ideal variety for continuous cropping of wheat stubble.

Key words: spring rice, wheat stubble rice, appearance quality, processing quality, nutritional quality, palatability

摘要：

以天津市培育的优质小站稻品种津川1号和隆优619为供试材料,分析了春稻和麦茬稻品质特性的差异。结果表明,津川1号作麦茬稻的整精米率明显低于作春稻,而垩白粒率显著高于春稻;津川1号麦茬稻的蛋白质含量明显偏高,食味值显著低于春稻;隆优619作春稻和麦茬稻无论在外观、加工、食味还是营养品质方面均无显著差异,是较理想的麦茬连作品种。

关键词: 春稻, 麦茬稻, 外观品质, 加工品质, 营养品质, 适口性

CLC Number:

S511.04

Fei ZHAO, Jian LIU, Jin DU, Gaoyi CAO, Chunyang XIANG, Xiuru WU, Yakun YANG. Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Spring Rice and Wheat Stubble Rice in Tianjin[J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(6): 112-114.

赵飞, 刘建, 杜锦, 曹高燚, 向春阳, 吴秀茹, 杨娅坤. 天津春稻和麦茬稻品质特性比较[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(6): 112-114.

Figures/Tables 5

References 10

[1]	何文斯. 1980—2010中国耕地复种时空格局变化研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2016.
[2]	刘建,谷守贤,崔晶. 北方杂交粳稻的食味品质与其亲本的相关性研究[J]. 杂交水稻,2018,33(1):50-54.
[3]	刘建,曹高燚,杜锦,等. 中日泰优质稻米的外观及食味差异性研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2017,19(10):59-65.
[4]	田南南,郭海峰,生华,等. 不同施肥处理对“稻花香”食味的影响[J]. 中国稻米,2016,22(6):30-33.
[5]	刘建,杨勇,杜锦,等. 天津产优质稻米和“稻花香”食味特性的比较[J]. 中国稻米,2019,25(2):20-23.
[6]	刘建,张欣,崔晶,等. 水稻品质分析仪在食味育种中的应用研究[J]. 种子,2013,32(10):15-20.
[7]	農林水産省農業研究センター,生物系特定産業技術研究推進機構. 稲と米:品質を活かす[M]. 東京:農林水産省農業研究センター,1989.
[8]	稲津脩. 北海道産米の食味向上による品質改善に関する研究[J]. 北海道立農試研報,1988,66:1-89.
[9]	岩崎哲也. 米の品質評価法[J]. 農林水産技術研究ジャーナル,1991,14(4):14-21.
[10]	松江勇次,原田稔,原田皓二. 北部九州における水稲品種のアミログラム特性,N、P、K 含量と食味との関係[J]. 日本作物学会九州支報,1989,56(1):43-44.

[1]	XU Qingyu, YU Jing, ZHU Dawei, ZHENG Xiaolong, MENG Lingqi, ZHU Zhiwei, SHAO Yafang. Nutritional Quality Evaluation of Different Rice Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis [J]. China Rice, 2022, 28(6): 1-8.
[2]	LIU Weiqi, XIAO Feng, ZENG Gai, XIAO Yinghui, LUO Lihua. Canonical Correlation Analysis on Relationship Between Appearance Quality Traits and Eating Quality Traits of Indica Hybrid Rice [J]. China Rice, 2022, 28(4): 40-43.
[3]	Ping LI, Guangchun ZHOU, Jing CUI, Fengying LI, Wenmin LI, Xinyan GU, Yuji MATSUE. Effects of Cooking Water Quality Combined with Water Addition and Soaking Time on Palatability of Japonica Rice [J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(6): 74-79.
[4]	Zhiqiang ZHAO, Xiaorong WEN, Yan GAO, Yuguo LI, Yingwu SHI, Hongmei YANG, Jun ZENG, Fengbing WANG. Effects of Combined Application of Photosynthetic Bacteria and Urea on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties, Enzyme Activities, and Rice Yield and Processing Quality [J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(5): 105-110.
[5]	Yongqiang FAN, Jihui LI, Shicui ZHENG, Yangang LIU. The Growth Characteristics and Yield of Broadcast Wheat Stubble Rice No-tillage Cultivation with Wheat Straw Mulching [J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(2): 95-97.
[6]	. Nutritional and Functional Characteristics of Rice Grain [J]. , 2020, 26(6): 1-11.
[7]	. Effects of Sowing Date and Filling Stage Temperature on Nutritional Quality and Taste Quality of Liaogeng 433 [J]. , 2020, 26(6): 96-99.
[8]	. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Jindao 919 [J]. , 2019, 25(6): 72-78.
[9]	. Comparison of the Palatability and Eating Quality of “Daohuaxiang” and High Quality Rice Produced in Tianjin [J]. , 2019, 25(2): 20-23.
[10]	. Reliability of Sensory Test for Japonica Rice Cultivars in the North of China [J]. , 2019, 25(1): 10-14.
[11]	. Influence of Different Fertilization Treatment on Eating Taste of Rice Variety Daohuaxiang [J]. , 2016, 22(6): 30-33.
[12]	. Effects of Organic Fertilizers on Quality and Palatability of Rice [J]. , 2016, 22(4): 42-45.
[13]	LU Jin-Gen-1, GAO Rong-Cun-1, LI Peng-1, XU Mei-Ling-2, LI Jin-Jun-1*. Breeding of Low-amylose Content Late Japonica Rice and its Taste Quality Analysis [J]. , 2014, 20(4): 41-45.
[14]	MENG Qing-Hong-12＃, YAN Song-1＃, WANG Shao-Yuan-1, ZHANG Zhi-Hong-1, YUAN Chao-1, ZHOU Ye-1, LU Shu-Wen-1. The Screening of Special Varieties of Processing Embryo-keeping Rice [J]. , 2014, 20(3): 50-53.
[15]	ZHU Xiao-Lin, LIN er-Ding. High-yielding Cultivation Techniques of Following Wheat Rice Y Liangyou 9918 [J]. , 2014, 20(1): 101-102.

Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Spring Rice and Wheat Stubble Rice in Tianjin

天津春稻和麦茬稻品质特性比较

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 10

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics