不同生育时期施用硅肥对优质食味粳稻产量和品质的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.01.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

探究不同生育时期施用硅肥对优质食味粳稻产量和品质的影响,可为优质食味粳稻合理施硅提供理论基础和技术支撑。以优质食味粳稻品种南粳9108为试验材料,以不施肥（CK1）和常规施肥（CK2）为对照,在常规施肥的基础上分别设置硅肥浸种（T1）、硅肥浸种+苗期喷施硅肥15 kg/hm²（T2）、硅肥浸种+拔节期喷施硅肥15 kg/hm²（T3）、硅肥浸种+抽穗期喷施硅肥15 kg/hm²（T4）、硅肥浸种+苗期20%、拔节期30%、抽穗期50%喷施硅肥15 kg/hm²（T5）、硅肥浸种+苗期1/3、拔节期1/3、抽穗期1/3喷施硅肥45 kg/hm²（T6）处理,比较不同施硅方式对水稻产量和品质的影响。结果表明,T6处理产量最高,其次是T5、T4、T3处理,T1和T2处理产量较CK2增幅较小;不同硅肥处理单位面积穗数、每穗颖花数、千粒重和结实率较不施硅处理均有不同程度提高。施硅对产量构成因素的影响大小依次为每穗颖花数>单位面积穗数>千粒重>结实率,T3、T5和T6处理的单位面积穗数和每穗颖花数增幅较大。与CK2相比,T3、T4、T5和T6处理增加了水稻库容量、源强度及源库比,提高了糙米率、精米率和整精米率,同时降低了垩白粒率、垩白度及蛋白质含量。T6处理稻米的峰值黏度、热浆黏度、崩解值、最终黏度较CK2显著提高,而其他处理对稻米淀粉黏滞谱特性的影响不显著。主成分分析结果表明,不同硅肥处理对水稻产量和品质影响的大小依次为T6>T5>T4>T3>T2>T1。综合考虑硅肥投入、水稻产量及品质,在常规施肥加硅肥浸种基础上,优质食味粳稻推荐硅肥施用方式为：喷施量15 kg/hm²,苗期占20%、拔节期占30%、抽穗期占50%。

关键词: 优质食味粳稻, 生育时期, 硅肥, 产量, 品质

Abstract:

The aims of this study were to identify the effects of silicon fertilizer applied at different stages on yield and quality of rice, and to provide theoretical basis and technical support for rational application of silicon fertilizer on japonica rice cultivar with good eating quality. The field experiment was conducted using good eating quality japonica rice Nangeng 9108 as material. Eight silicon fertilizer treatments were set up: seed soaking with silicon （T1）, T1 plus 15 kg/hm² silicon fertilizer applied by foliar spray at seedling stage （T2）, T1 plus 15 kg/hm² silicon fertilizer applied by foliar spray at jointing stage （T3）, T1 plus 15 kg/hm² silicon fertilizer applied by foliar spray at heading stage （T4）, T1 plus 15 kg/hm² silicon fertilizer applied by foliar spray at three stages （20% at seedling stage, 30% at jointing stage and 50% at heading stage）（T5）, T1 plus 45 kg/hm² silicon fertilizer applied by foliar spray at three stages （1/3 at seedling stage, 1/3 at jointing stage and 1/3 at heading stage）（T6）. No fertilization （CK1） and conventional fertilization （CK2） were used as the control. The results showed that T6 treatment has the highest yield, followed by T5, T4, T3 treatment. The grain yield of T1 and T2 treatments increased slightly compared to CK2. The panicles number, spikelet number per panicle, 1000-grain weight and seed setting rate of the silicon fertilizer treatments were improved to different degrees than no silicon fertilizer treatments. The effects of silicon fertilizer on yield components was in order of spikelet number per panicle > panicle number > 1000-grain weight > seed setting rate. Under different silicon fertilizer treatments, the effects of T3, T5, T6 treatments on spikelet number per panicle and panicle number were larger than those of T1, T2 and T4 treatments. Compared with CK2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 treatments increased sink potential, source strength and source-sink ratio, and increased the brown rice percentage, milled rice percentage and head rice percentage. Meanwhile, the chalky rice rate, chalkiness degree and protein content were also decreased. Compared with CK2, T6 treatment significantly increased peak viscosity, hot viscosity, break down and cool viscosity, while these indexes were insignificantly affected by other treatments. The principal component analysis results showed that the effects of different silicon fertilizer treatments on rice yield and quality were in order of T6 > T5 > T4 > T3 > T2 > T1. Considering the silicon fertilizer input, yield and quality of rice, recommended silicon fertilizer application method for high-quality japonica rice was seed soaking with silicon plus spraying silicon fertilizer 15 kg/hm² at three stages （20% at seedling stage, 30% at jointing stage and 50% at heading stage）.

Key words: japonica rice with good taste, growth stage, silicon fertilizer, grain yield, grain quality

中图分类号:

S511.062

杨国英, 郭智, 盛婧, 王国栋, 王鑫, 陈留根. 不同生育时期施用硅肥对优质食味粳稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(1): 68-74.

Guoying YANG, Zhi GUO, Jing SHENG, Guodong WANG, Xin WANG, Liugen CHEN. Effects of Silicon Fertilizer Applied at Different Stages on Grain Yield and Quality of Japonica Rice with Good Eating Quality[J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(1): 68-74.

图/表 9

表1 水稻生长期间平均温度、湿度、日均净辐射和降雨量

表2 不同生育时期施用硅肥对南粳9108产量及其构成因素的影响

表3 不同生育时期施用硅肥对南粳9108库容量、源强度和源库比的影响

表4 不同生育时期施用硅肥对南粳9108稻米加工和外观品质的影响（单位：%）

表5 不同生育时期施用硅肥对南粳9108稻米营养与食味品质的影响

表6 不同生育时期施用硅肥对南粳9108淀粉黏滞谱特性的影响

表7 主要品质指标的相关性分析

表8 不同硅肥处理的主成分分析

图1 不同硅肥处理的各主成分隶属函数值和综合评价值（图a、b、c分别代表第一主成分、第二主成分、第三主成分隶属函数值,图d代表综合评价值）

参考文献 26

[1]	王力,孙影,张洪程,等. 不同时期施用锌硅肥对优良食味粳稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报,2017,43(6):885-898.
[2]	商全玉,张文忠,韩亚东,等. 硅肥对北方粳稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学,2009,23(6):661-664.
[3]	邓接楼,王艾平,何长水,等. 硅肥对水稻生长发育及产量品质的影响[J].广东农业科学,2011,38(12):58-61.
[4]	龚金龙,胡雅杰,龙厚元,等. 不同时期施硅对超级稻产量和硅素吸收、利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2012,45(8):1 475-1 488.
[5]	茆卫华,陈慧. 喷施叶面硅肥对水稻产量的影响初探[J]. 安徽农学通报,2009,15(10):89-90.
[6]	王艳红,邓国季,戴鹏,等. 喷施叶面硅肥对Y两优143产量的影响[J]. 杂交水稻,2017,32(4):51-53.
[7]	杜同庆,徐鹏,刘秀秀,等. 淮北地区不同时期喷施硅肥对水稻生育及产量和品质影响研究[J]. 北方水稻,2018,48(4):24-26.
[8]	朱薇,全坚宇,陈豪,等. 叶面喷施水溶性硅肥对水稻产量及其物质生产的影响[J]. 农业开发与装备,2019(3):113-114.
[9]	张磊,陈雪丽,李伟群, 等. 叶喷式高效硅肥对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 现代化农业,2014(11):12-13.
[10]	任海,付立东,王宇,等. 硅肥与基本苗配置对水稻生长发育、产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2019(1):108-116.
[11]	熊洁,耿春苗,丁艳锋,等. 不同库容类型杂交早籼稻品种源库结构对垩白的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2011,44(19):3 970-3 980.
[12]	MINA U, KUMAR R, GOGAI R, et al.Effect of elevated temperature and carbon dioxide on maize genotypes health index[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 105: 292-302.
[13]	陶龙兴,王熹,廖西元,等. 灌浆期气温与源库强度对稻米品质的影响及其生理分析[J]. 应用生态学报,2006,17(4):647-652.
[14]	袁继超,丁志勇,赵超,等. 高海拔地区水稻遮光、剪叶和疏花对米质影响的研究[J]. 作物学报,2005,31(11):1 429-1 436.
[15]	任鄄胜,汪秀志,肖培村,等. 杂交水稻稻米品质性状的相关及聚类分析[J]. 中国水稻科学,2004,18(2):130-134.
[16]	HUANG M, JIANG L, ZOU Y, et al.On-farm assessment of effect of low temperature at seedling stage on early-season rice quality[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 141: 63-68.
[17]	吕艳梅,青先国. 稻米直链淀粉含量及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 湖南农业科学,2003(10):33-36.
[18]	高焕晔,王三根,宗学凤,等. 灌浆结实期高温干旱复合胁迫对稻米直链淀粉及蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012,20(1):40-47.
[19]	吴关庭,李旭晨. 稻米食味的研究与改良[J]. 中国农学通报,2000,16(6):21-24.
[20]	杨静,罗秋香,钱春荣,等. 氮素对稻米蛋白质组分含量及蒸煮食味品质的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报,2006,37(2):145-150.
[21]	谢宏,原蓼蓼,李丹丹,等. 含二硫键的稻米蛋白质对米饭蒸煮食味品质的影响[J]. 食品科技,2012,37(9):139-142.
[22]	李小为,任学坤,殷微微,等. 白浆土型水稻土施硅肥对水稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2008(6):67-69.
[23]	周广生,梅方竹,周竹青,等. 小麦不同品种耐湿性生理指标综合评价及其预测[J]. 中国农业科学,2003,36(11):1 378-1 382.
[24]	李晓芬,尚庆茂,张志刚,等. 多元统计分析方法在辣椒品种耐盐性评价中的应用[J]. 园艺学报,2008,35(3):351-356.
[25]	田治国,王飞,张文娥,等. 多元统计分析方法在万寿菊品种抗旱性评价中的应用[J]. 应用生态学报,2011,22(12):3 315-3 320.
[26]	樊保国,李登科. 制干枣品种品质性状的因子分析与综合评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2011,12(5):716-720.