中国稻米 ›› 2021, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 22-30.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2021.04.006

• 专论与研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

水稻生产成本效益国际比较及中国发展前景

李俊杰(), 李建平*()   

  1. 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-22 出版日期:2021-07-20 发布日期:2021-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 李建平
  • 作者简介:

    第一作者:lijunjie@caas.cn

  • 基金资助:
    国家现代农业产业技术体系“水稻产业经济岗位专家项目”(CARS-01-48);农业农村部课题“稻谷市场分析预警”(11200009)

International Comparison of Rice Production Cost and Benefit and China’s Development Prospects

Junjie LI(), Jianping LI*()   

  1. Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2021-03-22 Online:2021-07-20 Published:2021-07-20
  • Contact: Jianping LI
  • About author:

    1st author: lijunjie@caas.cn

摘要:

中国水稻生产成本逐年抬高,不断压缩利润空间,制约水稻产业发展,降低稻农的种植积极性,更影响粮食安全。比较分析了近年中美日稻谷生产成本收益结构和生产效率变化趋势,发现:从结构上看,与美、日相比,中国稻谷生产固定资产投资低、劳动力成本高、土地成本不稳定、化肥投入比重较高、信贷支持弱、科技进步贡献偏低;从近30年的变化趋势来看,中国投入产出比率呈下降趋势,土地产出率的增长速率远低于美国,劳动生产率的绝对水平低于日本,反映中国水稻资源条件和技术创新应用、管理体制机制在降本增效方面发挥的作用效果落后于美国和日本。中国水稻产业发展需要基于规模经营和小户经营长期并存的背景,分类推广适用发展模式,加快地方适用品种和绿色高产技术推广应用,持续实施水稻支持政策。

关键词: 水稻, 成本效益, 国际比较, 中国, 美国, 日本

Abstract:

The cost of rice production in China has been rising year by year, continuously reducing profit margins, which is restricting the development of the rice industry, reducing the enthusiasm of rice farmers for planting, and even affecting food security. The United States of America and Japan represent two advanced development models of rice production in the world. By comparing and analyzing the change trends of rice production cost and income structure as well as production efficiency in China, the United States of America and Japan, we concluded that China’s rice production has low investment in fixed assets, high labor costs, unstable land costs, a high proportion of fertilizer inputs, weak credit support, and low contribution to technological advancement from a structural point of view. In view of the trend of change in the past 30 years, Japan’s production efficiency remained stable, China’s input-output ratio was on a downward trend, the growth rate of land output rate was much lower than that of the United States of America, and the absolute level of labor productivity was lower than that of Japan. These facts reflected that China’s rice technology innovation application and management system mechanism on the effect of reducing costs and increasing efficiency lagged behind those of the United States of America and Japan. The development of China’s rice industry needs to base on the long-term coexistence of large-scale operations and small-scale operations, classifying and promoting suitable development models, accelerating the promotion and application of locally applicable varieties and green high-yielding technologies, and continuing to implement rice support policies.

Key words: rice, cost and benefits, international comparison, China, the United States of America, Japan

中图分类号: