不同外源物质及喷施时期对滩涂水稻穗部性状、产量及品质的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2024.02.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以南粳5055为供试品种，于2021年在江苏滩涂地区（土壤盐分1.11~1.26 g/kg）开展田间试验，研究不同外源物质及喷施时期（2次：分蘖期、孕穗期和3次：分蘖期、孕穗期、灌浆期）对滩涂水稻穗部性状及产量、品质的影响。试验设置7个处理，即喷施清水（CK）、禾稼春喷施2次（L1-2）、碧护喷施2次（L2-2）、萘乙酸喷施2次（L3-2）、禾稼春喷施3次（L1-3）、碧护喷施3次（L2-3）和萘乙酸喷施3次（L3-3）。结果表明，喷施外源物质具有提高水稻产量的效果，与CK相比，L2-2、L2-3、L3-2和L3-3分别显著提高产量17.69%、17.80%、11.62%和13.42%，L1-2和L1-3则分别提高产量6.66%和7.09%，但差异不显著；喷施外源物质对稻米品质影响不大。喷施外源物质对水稻有效穗数和结实率均没有明显影响，但显著增加实粒数；L1-2、L2-2、L1-3和L3-3处理显著增加每穗粒数，L2-2和L2-3处理显著增加千粒重。喷施外源物质对水稻一次枝梗的枝梗数、总粒数、实粒数和结实率没有显著影响，而对二次枝梗的枝梗数、总粒数、实粒数及结实率均有不同程度的增加效果，且二次枝梗对每穗粒数的贡献率普遍提高。对同一种外源物质而言，喷施2次和喷施3次对水稻产量、穗部性状的影响没有显著差异。碧护喷施处理提高水稻产量主要是由每穗粒数、每穗实粒数和千粒重提高引起的，萘乙酸喷施处理提高水稻产量主要是每穗粒数、每穗实粒数提高引起的，而每穗粒数的提高主要与二次枝梗数及二次枝梗的总粒数和实粒数增加有关。因此，今后在滩涂地区种植水稻，可通过在分蘖期和孕穗期喷施外源叶面肥或植物生长调节剂来改善穗粒结构特别是二次枝梗性状，达到增产增收的目的。

关键词: 水稻, 外源物质, 植物生长调节剂, 喷施时期, 穗部性状, 滩涂

Abstract:

A field experiment was carried out in tidal flat of Jiangsu Province (the salt content in the soil is 1.11-1.26 g/kg) in 2021 to study the effects of different exogenous substances and spraying periods (2 times: tillering stage, booting stage and 3 times: tillering stage, booting stage, filling stage) on the panicle traits, yield and quality of rice, taking Nanjing 5055 as the test variety. Seven treatments were set up in the experiment, including spraying clean water (CK), spraying Hejiachun twice (L1-2), spraying Bihu twice (L2-2), spraying Naphthoacetic twice (L3-2), spraying Hejiachun three times (L1-3), spraying Bihu three times (L2-3), and spraying Naphthylacetic three times (L3-3). The results showed that spraying exogenous substances had the effect of improving rice yield. Compared with CK (the rice yield was 7 310.3 kg/hm²), L2-2, L2-3, L3-2, and L3-3 significantly increased rice yields by 17.69%, 17.80%, 11.62%, and 13.42%, while L1-2 and L1-3 increased rice yields by 6.66% and 7.09%, respectively, but the difference was not significant. However, spraying treatments had little effect on quality of rice. Spraying exogenous substances did not significantly affect the effective panicle number and seed setting rate of rice, but significantly increased the number of solid grains. L1-2, L2-2, L1-3 and L3-3 treatments significantly increased the number of grains per spike, while L2-2 and L2-3 treatments significantly increased the weight of 1 000 grains. Spraying exogenous substances did not significantly affect the number of branches, total number of grains, number of solid grains and seed setting rate of primary branches and stems of rice, but increased the number of branches, total number of grains, number of solid grains and seed setting rate of secondary branches of rice, and the contribution rate of secondary branches to grain number per panicle has generally increased. For the same exogenous substance, there was no significant difference in the effects of spraying twice and spraying three times on rice yield and panicle traits. The increase of rice yield under Bihu spraying treatment was mainly caused by the increase of grain number per panicle, solid grain number per panicle and 1000-grain weight. The increase of grain number per panicle under Naphthoacetic spraying treatment was mainly caused by the increase of grain number per panicle and solid grain number per panicle, and the increase of grain number per panicle was mainly related to the increase of the number of secondary branches, the total number of grains and solid grain number of secondary branches. Therefore, when planting rice in the tidal flat in the future, we can improve the spike grain structure, especially the secondary branch characters, by spraying exogenous foliar fertilizer or plant growth regulators at the tillering stage and booting stage, so as to increase rice yield and income.

Key words: rice, exogenous substances, plant growth regulator, spraying period, panicle characters, tidal flat

中图分类号:

S511.05

张蛟, 韩继军, 崔士友, 陈澎军, 缪源卿. 不同外源物质及喷施时期对滩涂水稻穗部性状、产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2024, 30(2): 31-36.

ZHANG Jiao, HAN Jijun, CUI Shiyou, CHEN Pengjun, MIAO Yuanqing. Effects of Different Exogenous Substances and Spraying Period on Panicle Characters, Yield and Quality of Rice in Tidal Flat[J]. China Rice, 2024, 30(2): 31-36.

图/表 6

图1 水稻种植过程中滩涂土壤盐分和pH值的动态变化特征

表1 喷施外源物质对滩涂水稻农艺性状及产量的影响

表2 喷施外源物质对滩涂水稻穗部一次枝梗性状的影响

表3 喷施外源物质对滩涂水稻穗部二次枝梗性状的影响

表4 滩涂水稻产量及每穗粒数与穗部枝梗性状之间的相关关系（r）

表5 喷施不同外源物质及喷施时期对稻米主要品质性状的影响

参考文献 40

[1]	秦忠彬. 保障国家粮食安全是农业综合开发的重要任务[J]. 中国农业综合开发, 2011(5):26-28.
[2]	向栋良, 陈美招, 郑雪, 等. 基于供需平衡的2050年中国粮食安全研究[J]. 农业科学, 2020, 10(8):590-601.
[3]	陈君, 张长宽, 林康, 等. 江苏沿海滩涂资源围垦开发利用研究[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(2):213-219.
[4]	袁隆平建议加快海水稻品种审定,1年内可增产300亿kg粮食[J]. 粮食加工, 2019, 44(1):37.
[5]	张梅, 王宇, 赵兰坡, 等. 苏打盐碱土种稻改良的水资源高效利用田间试验研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2014, 33(1):132-134.
[6]	王相平, 杨劲松, 姚荣江, 等. 苏北滩涂水稻微咸水灌溉模式及土壤盐分动态变化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(7):54-63.
[7]	严凯, 蒋玉兰, 唐纪元, 等. 盐碱地条件下施氮量和栽插密度对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(2):67-74.
[8]	张蛟, 崔士友, 胡帅栋, 等. 水稻种植对沿海滩涂土壤有机碳及碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(3):107-112.
[9]	张蛟, 崔士友, 陈澎军, 等. 沿海滩涂水稻种植对土壤微生物量碳和水溶性有机碳的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(17):222-228.
[10]	KANAWAPEE N, SANITCHON J, SRIHABAN P, et al. Physiological changes during development of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties differing in salt tolerance under saline field condition[J]. Plant and Soil, 2013, 370(1/2): 89-101.
[11]	ABBAS G, SAQIB M, AKHTAR J, et al. Physiological and biochemical characterization of Acacia stenophylla and Acacia albida exposed to salinity under hydroponic conditions[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2017, 47(9): 1 293-1 301.
[12]	周根友, 翟彩娇, 邓先亮, 等. 盐逆境对水稻产量、光合特性及品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(2):146-154.
[13]	董晓亮, 侯红燕, 张金凤, 等. 缓释肥和无机肥配施对滨海盐碱地水稻生长和食味品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(4):1-7.
[14]	朱明霞, 高显颖, 邵玺文, 等. 不同浓度盐碱胁迫对水稻生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 吉林农业科学, 2014, 39(6):12-16.
[15]	SHRIVASTAVA P, KUMAR R. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation[J]. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 2015, 22(2): 123-131.
[16]	NUMAN M, BASHIR S, KHAN Y, et al. Plant growth promoting bacteria as an alternative strategy for salt tolerance in plants: A review[J]. Microbiological Research, 2018, 209: 21-32.
[17]	韦还和, 葛佳琳, 张徐彬, 等. 盐胁迫下粳稻品种南粳9108分蘖特性及其与群体生产力的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(8):1238-1 247.
[18]	张蛟, 陈澎军, 陈艳, 等. 滩涂水产养殖池复垦种稻短期内土壤特性变化及水稻产量表现[J]. 作物杂志, 2023(4):118-125.
[19]	张蛟, 翟彩娇, 崔士友. 微咸水灌溉滩涂稻田盐分动态及其水稻产量表现[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2018, 34(4):799-803.
[20]	翟彩娇, 张蛟, 崔士友, 等. 盐逆境对耐盐水稻穗部性状及产量构成因素的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(4):1-9.
[21]	李小明, 龙惊惊, 周悦, 等. 叶面肥的应用及研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(3):127-130.
[22]	乐丽红, 江文凡, 陈忠平, 等. 水稻有机生物叶面肥在双季晚稻上的施用效果研究[J]. 江西农业, 2018(6):31-32.
[23]	杜同庆, 徐鹏, 刘秀秀, 等. 淮北地区不同时期喷施硅肥对水稻生育及产量和品质影响研究[J]. 北方水稻, 2018, 48(4):24-26.
[24]	姜红芳, 郭晓红, 胡月, 等. 镁肥对寒地膜下滴灌旱种水稻产量的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2018(6):20-23.
[25]	李冠男, 黄立华, 黄金鑫, 等. 盐碱地水稻结实初期不同叶面肥喷施对稻米品质的影响[J]. 土壤与作物, 2020, 9(2):126-135.
[26]	冯棣, 高倩, 崔凯, 等. 盐分胁迫下喷施γ-氨基丁酸对水稻秧苗生长的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(6):43-48.
[27]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
[28]	刘金波, 刘晓丽, 王宝祥, 等. 水稻一次枝梗数和二次枝梗数的遗传[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2013, 29(6):1187-1 192.
[29]	肖应辉, 周倩倩, 罗丽华. 水稻穗粒数及相关性状的遗传研究进展[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 39(3):221-227.
[30]	李红宇, 潘世驹, 钱永德, 等. 混合盐碱胁迫对寒地水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2015, 46(12):2100-2 105.
[31]	郑卓, 江振方, 王复标, 等. 水稻早熟大穗品系7-37二次枝梗数的QTL定位研究[J]. 井冈山大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 41(5):31-37.
[32]	贺奇, 王昕, 马洪文, 等. 盐碱胁迫对宁夏水稻籽粒灌浆及穗部性状的影响[J]. 东北农业科学, 2021, 46(6):11-16.
[33]	杨福, 梁正伟, 王志春. 苏打盐碱胁迫对水稻品种长白9号穗部性状及产量构成的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2010, 25(增刊2):59-61.
[34]	崔士友, 张洋, 翟彩娇, 等. 复垦滩涂微咸水灌溉下粳稻产量和品质的表现[J]. 作物杂志, 2022(1):1-6.
[35]	秦猛, 刘丽华, 郑桂萍, 等. 不同叶面肥及施用时期对水稻穗部性状及产量、品质的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(9):20-26.
[36]	赵黎明, 李明, 冯乃杰, 等. 植物生长调节剂对寒地水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(3):43-48.
[37]	朱聪聪, 邓建平, 张洪程, 等. 生化试剂对机插水稻产量及生理生态特征的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2015, 21(6):28-31.
[38]	唐志伟, 严玲玲, 刘钰琪, 等. 不同抗寒剂浸种与叶面喷施对早稻秧苗素质及产量的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 45(6):565-570.
[39]	胡继鑫, 王光明, 徐海. 水稻穗部性状与品质和产量的关系综述[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(3):923-925.
[40]	王昌华, 徐正进, 夏永胜, 等. 水稻穗部性状及其与产量相关分析[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2007(3):54-56.