水稻铁锰中毒及调控策略研究进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2026.02.007

中国稻米 ›› 2026, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 38-44.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2026.02.007

水稻铁锰中毒及调控策略研究进展

涂国青¹^,²(), 吴加香³, 张一晨³, 郭世伟⁴, 徐玖亮²^,⁶^,^*(), 赵正雄²^,⁵^,^*()

¹云南大学国际河流与生态安全研究院，昆明 650500
²洱海流域农业绿色发展研究院，云南大理 671000
³云南云天化股份有限公司研究院，昆明 650228
⁴南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院，南京 210095
⁵云南农业大学资源与环境学院，昆明 650201
⁶中国农业大学资源与环境学院，北京 100193

收稿日期:2025-09-08 出版日期:2026-03-20 发布日期:2026-03-11
通讯作者: ^*jlxu9@cau.edu.cn;zhaozx0801@163.com
作者简介:
第一作者：1095415590@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFD1901504);云南省重大科技专项(202202AE090034)

Iron and Manganese Poisoning in Rice: Physiological Mechanisms, Management and Future Prospects

TU Guoqing¹^,²(), WU Jiaxiang³, ZHANG Yichen³, GUO Shiwei⁴, XU Jiuliang²^,⁶^,^*(), ZHAO Zhengxiong²^,⁵^,^*()

¹Institute of International Rivers and Ecological Security, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
²Erhai Lake Basin Agricultural Green Development Research Institute, Dali, Yunnan 671000, China
³Research Institute of Yunnan Yuntianhua Co., Ltd, Kunming 650228, China
⁴College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
⁵College of Resources and Environment, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
⁶College of Resources and Environment, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2025-09-08 Published:2026-03-20 Online:2026-03-11
Contact: ^*jlxu9@cau.edu.cn;zhaozx0801@163.com
About author:
1st author: 1095415590@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

水稻是全球超过50%人口的主食。在南亚、东南亚和非洲地区，水稻生产深受铁（Fe）、锰（Mn）中毒影响，造成的产量损失少则15%，高的甚至绝收。Fe、Mn中毒常发生于高有机质含量或长期淹水的土壤环境，在该土壤中Fe³⁺和Mn⁴⁺被还原为活性较高的Fe²⁺和Mn²⁺形态，进而引发植物代谢失调。当前，减轻Fe、Mn毒害的生产管理措施主要包括耐Fe、Mn品种筛选，磷（P）、钾（K）、锌（Zn）与氮（N）肥的施用以及氧化钙和水分管理综合运用等。不过生理碱性肥料在高有机质、中性土壤以及长期淹水稻田中的调控效果均不理想。鉴于人类Fe、Mn中毒与植物Fe、Mn中毒存在共性，未来研究可加强跨学科整合，构建系统完整的研究体系，为水稻Fe、Mn中毒防治提供更坚实的理论基础和更有效的实践策略。

关键词: 水稻, 铁锰中毒, 生理机制, 管理措施

Abstract:

Rice serves as the staple food for over 50% of the global population. In regions such as Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia, rice production is severely affected by iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) toxicity, resulting in yield losses ranging from a minimum of 15% to, in severe cases, complete crop failure. Fe and Mn toxicity often occurs in soil environments with high organic matter content or prolonged flooding, where Fe and Mn are reduced to their more reactive forms, Fe³⁺ and Mn⁴⁺, leading to metabolic disorders in plants. Currently, production management measures to mitigate Fe and Mn toxicity primarily include the screening of Fe/Mn-tolerant rice varieties, the combined application of phosphorus, potassium, zinc, and nitrogen fertilizers, as well as the integrated use of calcium oxide and water management strategies. However, the regulatory effects of physiologically alkaline fertilizers are unsatisfactory in high-organic-matter, neutral soils, and paddy fields under prolonged flooding. Given the commonalities between human and plant Fe/Mn toxicity, future research should enhance interdisciplinary integration and establish a systematic and comprehensive research framework to provide a more solid theoretical foundation and more effective practical strategies for the prevention and control of Fe and Mn toxicity in rice.

Key words: rice, iron and manganese poisoning, physiological mechanism, management measures

中图分类号:

S511

涂国青, 吴加香, 张一晨, 郭世伟, 徐玖亮, 赵正雄. 水稻铁锰中毒及调控策略研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(2): 38-44.

TU Guoqing, WU Jiaxiang, ZHANG Yichen, GUO Shiwei, XU Jiuliang, ZHAO Zhengxiong. Iron and Manganese Poisoning in Rice: Physiological Mechanisms, Management and Future Prospects[J]. China Rice, 2026, 32(2): 38-44.

图/表 3

参考文献 73

[1]	ONAGA G, DRAMEK N, ISMAIL A M. Understanding the regulation of iron nutrition: can it contribute to improving iron toxicity tolerance in rice[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2016, 43 (8): 709-726.
[2]	MATSUO K, AE N, VORACHIT S. Reducing the risk of iron toxicity by imposing unsaturated conditions before flooding[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2017, 48 (9):1078-1 088.
[3]	SHAO J F, YAMAJI N, SHEN R F, et al. The key to Mn homeostasis in plants: Regulation of Mn transporters[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2017, 22 (3): 215-224.
[4]	邱园园, 刘昆, 卓鑫鑫, 等. 铁的生理功能及其对水稻产量和品质影响的研究综述[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(1):43-47.
[5]	BECKER M, ASCH F. Iron toxicity in rice: Conditions and management concepts[J]. Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2005, 168(4): 558-573.
[6]	AUNG M S, MASUDA H. How does rice defend against excess iron?: Physiological and molecular mechanisms[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11: 1 102.
[7]	李仕金, 柯璐瑶, 刘志玲, 等. 洱海流域水稻生产技术存在的问题、对策及建议[J]. 中国种业, 2024(2):35-38.
[8]	FECHT-CHRISTOFFERS M M, BRAUN H P, LEMAITRE-GUILLIER C, et al. Effect of manganese toxicity on the proteome of the leaf apoplast in cowpea[J]. Plant Physiology, 2003, 133(4): 1 935-1 946.
[9]	WU L B, UEDA Y, LAI S K. et al. Shoot tolerance mechanisms to iron toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2017, 40(4): 570-584.
[10]	LI F, YAO Y S, MA J P, et al. Combined metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis to reveal the response of rice to Mn toxicity stress[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2025, 289: 117 454.
[11]	NABLE R O, HOUTZ R L, CHENIAE G M. Early inhibition of photosynthesis during development of Mn toxicity in tobacco[J]. Plant Physiology, 1988, 86(4): 1 136-1 142.
[12]	SUBRAHMANYAM D, RATHORE V S. Influence of manganese toxicity on photosynthesis in ricebean (Vigna umbellate) seedling[J]. Photosythetica, 2000, 38(3): 449-453.
[13]	ROGALLA H, R MHELD V. Role of leaf apoplast in silicon-mediated manganese tolerance of Cucumis sativus L[J]. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2002, 25(4): 549-555.
[14]	MORALES F, GRASA R, ABADIA A, et al. Iron chlorosis paradox in fruit trees[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1998, 21(4): 815-825.
[15]	ABADIA J. Leaf responses to Fe deficiency: A review[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1992, 15(10): 1 699- 1 713.
[16]	LIU Y, CHEN J Y, LI X H, et al. Effects of manganese toxicity on the growth and gene expression at the seedling stage of soybean[J]. Phyton, 2022, 91(5): 975-987.
[17]	刘鑫, 朱端卫, 雷宏军, 等. 酸性土壤活性锰与pH、Eh关系及其生物反应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2003, 9(3):317-323.
[18]	牛红榜, 刘万学, 万方浩. 紫茎泽兰(Ageratina adenophora)入侵对土壤微生物群落和理化性质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(7):3051-3 060.
[19]	牛红榜, 刘万学, 万方浩, 等. 紫茎泽兰根际土壤中优势细菌的筛选鉴定及拮抗性能评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(12):2795-2 800.
[20]	LIU C S, GAO T, LIU Y H, et al. Isotopic fingerprints indicate distinct strategies of Fe uptake in rice[J]. Chemical Geology, 2019, 524: 323-328.
[21]	TSUNEMITSU Y, YAMAJI N, MA J F, et al. Rice reduces Mn uptake in response to Mn stress[J]. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2018, 13(1): e1422466.
[22]	CHEN Z H, FUJII Y, YAMAJI N, et al. Mn tolerance in rice is mediated by MTP8. 1, a member of the cation diffusion facilitator family[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64(14): 4 375-4 387.
[23]	董家瑜, 吴天昊, 孙远涛, 等. 不同锰浓度环境下OsNRAMP5突变对水稻耐热性和主要经济性状的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2021, 36(2):79-88.
[24]	EDMOND C, SHIGAKI T, EWERT S, et al. Comparative analysis of CAX2-like cation transporters indicates functional and regulatory diversity[J]. Biochemical Journal, 2009, 418(1): 145-154.
[25]	DELHAIZE E, GRUBER B D, PITTMAN J K, et al. A role for the AtMTP11 gene of Arabidopsis in manganese transport and tolerance[J]. The Plant Journal, 2007, 51(2): 198-210.
[26]	许文博, 邵新庆, 王宇通, 等. 锰对植物的生理作用及锰中毒的研究进展[J]. 草原与草坪, 2011, 31(3):10.
[27]	ZHANG Y, GUO H Z, LIU P, Morphological and physiological responses of root tip cells to Fe²⁺ toxicity in rice[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2011, 33: 683-689.
[28]	ALVAREZ J, DATNOFF L E. The economic potential of silicon for integrated management and sustainable rice production[J]. Crop Protection, 2001, 20: 43-48.
[29]	张玉秀, 李林峰, 柴团耀, 等. 锰对植物毒害及植物耐锰机理研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2010, 45(4):506-520.
[30]	PAN Y H, SHI J, LI J Y, et al. Regulatory mechanism through which old soybean leaves respond to Mn toxicity stress[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2024, 25(10): 5 341.
[31]	LI G J, WU J L, KRONZUCKER H J, et al. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of plant-root responses to iron toxicity[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2024, 297: 154 257.
[32]	BHAT M A, MISHRA A K, SHAH S N, et al. Soil and mineral nutrients in plant health: A prospective study of iron and phosphorus in the growth and development of plants[J]. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 2024 46(6): 5 194-5 222.
[33]	SONU, NANDAKUMAR S, SINGH V J, et al. Implications of tolerance to iron toxicity on root system architecture changes in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2024, 7: 1 334 487.
[34]	VU H T T, LE C T T, PHAN H T T, et al. Relative changes in growth and recovery responses of rice to Fe-toxicity at different growth stages[J]. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 2024, 25(3): 25-37.
[35]	HU H R, BI L Y, WANG L, et al. The effects of different iron and phosphorus treatments on the formation and morphology of iron plaque in rice roots (Oryza sativa L)[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 14: 1 304 505.
[36]	ZHAO J J, WANG W Y, ZHOU H K, et al. Manganese toxicity inhibited root growth by disrupting auxin biosynthesis and transport in Arabidopsis[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 272.
[37]	TANAKA A, NAVASERO S A. Interaction between iron and manganese in the rice plant[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 1966, 12(5): 29-33.
[38]	HU R F, LIMMER M A, SEYFFERTH A L, et al. How manganese affects rice cadmium uptake and translocation in vegetative and mature plants[J]. Plant and Soil, 2024, 504(1): 941-954.
[39]	QIN Y, LI Z M, SUN J, et al. Manganese (II) sulfate affects the formation of iron-manganese oxides in soil and the uptake of cadmium and arsenic by rice[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2023, 263: 115 360.
[40]	TANAKA A, LOE R, NAVASERO S A. Some mechanisms involved in the development of iron toxicity symptoms in the rice plant[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 1966, 12(4): 32-38.
[41]	LI J F, JIA Y D, RONGSHU D, et al. Advances in the mechanisms of plant tolerance to manganese toxicity[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20(20): 5 096.
[42]	FREI M, TETTEH R N, RAZAFINDRAZAKA A L, et al. Responses of rice to chronic and acute iron toxicity: Genotypic differences and biofortification aspects[J]. Plant and Soil, 2016, 408(1): 149-161.
[43]	PONNAMOERUMA F N, BRADFIELD R, PEECH M. Physiological disease of rice attributable to iron toxicity[J]. Nature, 1955, 175(4449): 265.
[44]	AUDEBERT A, FOFANA M. Rice yield gap due to iron toxicity in west Africa[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2009, 195(1): 66-76.
[45]	AUDEBERT A, SAHRAWAT K L. Mechanisms for iron toxicity tolerance in lowland rice[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2000, 23(11/12): 1 877-1 885.
[46]	CARRASCO-GIL S, RODRIGUEZ-MENENDEZ S, FERNANDEZ B, et al. Silicon induced Fe deficiency affects Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn distribution in rice (Oryza sativa L.) growth in calcareous conditions[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2018, 125: 153-163.
[47]	ZHONG S X, YU S, LIU Y H, et al. Impact of flooding-drainage alternation on Fe uptake and transport in rice: Novel insights from iron isotopes[J]. Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2024, 72(3): 1 500-1 508.
[48]	RADMANN V, SOUSA R O, WEINERT C, et al. Soil solution and rice nutrition under liming and water management in a soil from Amazonian natural fields[J]. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Do Solo, 2023, 47: e0220101.
[49]	EL-JAOUAL E T, COX D A, BARKER A V, et al. Relationship of iron-manganese toxicity disorder in marigold to manganese and magnesium nutrition[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2012, 35(1): 142-164.
[50]	LIU Y, PAN Y, LI J Y, et al. Transcriptome sequencing analysis of root in soybean responding to Mn poisoning[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24(16): 12 727.
[51]	SCARPELLINI C, KLEJBOROWSKA G, LANTHIER C, et al. Beyond ferrostatin-1: A comprehensive review of ferroptosis inhibitors[J]. Pharmacological Sciences, 2023, 44(12): 902-916.
[52]	DANGOL S, CHEN Y, HWANG B K, et al. Iron-and reactive oxygen species-dependent ferroptotic cell death in rice-Magnaporthe oryzae interactions[J]. Plant Cell, 2019, 31(1): 189-209.
[53]	DISTEFANO A M, LOPEZ G A, BAUER V, et al. Ferroptosis in plants: Regulation of lipid peroxidation and redox status[J]. Biochemical Journal, 2022, 479(7): 857-866.
[54]	LEE J, ROH J L. Lipid metabolism in ferroptosis: Unraveling key mechanisms and therapeutic potential in cancer[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Reviews on Cancer, 2025, 1 880(1): 142-164.
[55]	TAO L, ZHU H, LUO X Y. et al. Manganese toxicity elicits the degradation of auxin transport carriers to restrain Arabidopsis root growth[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2024, 225: 105 863.
[56]	WENGLER, M R, TALBOT N J. Mechanisms of regulated cell death during plant infection by the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. Cell Death & Differentiation, 2025, 32(5): 793-801.
[57]	XIONG X Q, ZENG J, NING Q, et al. Ferroptosis induction in host rice by endophyte OsiSh-2 is necessary for mutualism and disease resistance in symbiosis[J]. Nature Communications, 2024, 15: 5 012.
[58]	IGLESIAS-MATESANZ P, LACALLE-GONZALEZ C, LOPEZ-BLAZQUEZ C, et al. Glutathione peroxidases: An emerging and promising therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer treatment[J]. Antioxidants, 2024, 13(11): 1 405.
[59]	YAMAZAKI S, OCHIAI K, MATOH T. Rice plants have three homologs of glutathione synthetase genes, one of which, OsGS2, codes for hydroxymethyl-glutathione synthetase[J]. Plant Direct, 2019, 3(2): e00119.
[60]	WANG J, XIE Y L, ZHU G Q, et al. Mitochondria-targeted H₂O₂ homeostatic disruptors: Harnessing glutathione autoxidation and reversing GSDME “silencing” for ferroptotic and dual-pathway pyroptotic oncotherapy[J]. Nano Today, 2025, 61: 102 640.
[61]	LI W F, HAN X W, LAN P. Emerging roles of protein phosphorylation in plant iron homeostasis[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2022, 27(9): 908-921.
[62]	MURGIA I, MORANDINI P. Plant iron research in african countries: Current “hot spots”, approaches, and potentialities[J]. Plants, 2024, 13(1): 14.
[63]	TAKAGI D, ISHIYAMA K, SUGANAMI M, et al. Manganese toxicity disrupts indole acetic acid homeostasis and suppresses the CO₂ assimilation reaction in rice leaves[J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 20 922.
[64]	LIU P, HUANG R, HU X, et al. Physiological responses and proteomic changes reveal insights into Stylosanthes response to manganese toxicity[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2019, 19(1): 212.
[65]	FODOR F. Iron nutrition and its biochemical interactions in plants: iron uptake, biofortification, bacteria, and fungi in focus[J]. Plants, 2024, 13(5): 561.
[66]	KHAIRULLAH I, SALEH M, ALWI M, et al. Increasing productivity of rice through iron toxicity control in acid sulfate soils of tidal swampland[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 648(1): 012151.
[67]	SIRIWARDANA K G D l, WEERASINGHE D P, PRIYANTHA G D A, et al. Screening of selected rice varieties and advanced breeding lines against iron toxicity under field conditions in the low country wet zone of Sri Lanka[J]. Tropical Agricultural Research, 2019, 30(2): 33.
[68]	THEERAWITAYA C, WANCHANA S, RUANJAICHON V, et al. Determination of traits responding to iron toxicity stress at different stages and genome-wide association analysis for iron toxicity tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13: 994 560.
[69]	FARTHING E C, MENGUER P K, FETT J P, et al. OsMTP11 is localised at the Golgi and contributes to Mn tolerance[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 15 258.
[70]	SHRESTHA A, DZIWORNU A K, UEDA Y, et al. Genome-wide association study to identify candidate loci and genes for Mn toxicity tolerance in rice[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(2): e0192116.
[71]	LI L, YE L X, KONG Q H. et al. A vacuolar membrane ferric-chelate reductase, OsFRO1, alleviates Fe toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 700.
[72]	SIKIROU M, SHITTU A, MOUKOUMBI Y D, et al. Field evaluation of rice lines derived from suakoko 8 X Bao Thai for iron tolerance in the south Saharan African farming system[J]. Plants, 2024, 13(12): 1 610.
[73]	LESTARI S U, ROESWITAWATI D, SYAFRANI S, et al. The impact of newly split rice fields in muara kelantan sungai mandau village, siak regency on iron (Fe) content[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Environmental, Energy, and Earth Science, ICEEES 2023, Pekanbaru, Indoresia.

水稻铁锰中毒及调控策略研究进展

Iron and Manganese Poisoning in Rice: Physiological Mechanisms, Management and Future Prospects

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 73

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	吴海燕, 李庆. 江西省水稻大面积单产提升面临的问题与对策[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(2): 1-6.
[2]	祝丽娟, 祁雪, 王春燕, 陈豪, 张义凯, 张玉屏. 岩棉与基质育秧对机插秧苗生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(2): 102-106.
[3]	张屹, 谢红军, 曾晓珊, 肖峰, 汤国华, 朱明东, 余应弘. 利用分子标记辅助选择改良两系不育系33S稻瘟病抗性和米质的研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(2): 113-117.
[4]	李蕾, 季森. 无锡市2024年水稻生产与困境分析及应对策略[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(2): 124-128.
[5]	徐春春, 纪龙, 陈中督, 孙艺荧, 李丹, 方福平. 2025年我国水稻产业形势分析及2026年展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(2): 19-22.
[6]	姚鉴兼, 刘伯涵, 贺记外, 庄文, 潘素君, 吴俊. 杂交水稻亲本异交特性研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(2): 23-29.
[7]	韦任园, 李荣凯, 崔茂亚, 刘知博, 柳聚阁, 韦还和, 许轲, 戴其根, 陈英龙. 纳米硅缓解水稻盐胁迫的研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(2): 30-37.
[8]	谈颖, 高发瑞, 卢淼, 王刘西航, 杨圣杰, 展颖超, 冯尚宗, 傅生辉, 刘双喜. 基于三维重建的分蘖期水稻性状提取方法研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(2): 45-52.
[9]	李彬, 张双, 杨怡, 陈家帅, 罗庚. 智慧农业技术引领下的水稻生产体系转型与多维效益提升路径[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(2): 53-59.
[10]	徐云姬, 黄钰, TRAYE Indrila Dey, 翁雪莲, 张伟杨, 朱宽宇, 朱广龙, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 栽培措施对优质食味水稻产量和品质的调控作用[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(2): 67-74.
[11]	黄章慧, 李逍遥, 黄广艺, 丁晓敏, 严添安, 陈莹, 王昕钰, 李梦兴, 张颖, 柯达, 张鹏, 梁开明, 傅友强, 何秀英. 水稻合理密植增产增效栽培技术对水稻产量与资源利用效率的影响评价——以广东翁源县试验为例[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(2): 7-11.
[12]	莫小荣, 许长鑫, 冯金飞, 王亚茹, 王宏航, 李凤博. 水稻品种与肥料管理的优化互作对气态氮排放与产量的协同效应[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(2): 75-80.
[13]	王花, 褚光. 黔东南山区县水稻大面积单产提升的实践与思考——以台江县为例[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(1): 1-5.
[14]	林志坚, 林成豹, 唐江霞, 邓则勤, 黄显波, 苏荣理. 聚合Bph14、Bph15基因水稻对褐飞虱的抗性研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(1): 102-106.
[15]	周宇杰, 骆琴, 李润景, 曹子建, 蒋楠. 腐殖酸提高噁霉灵抑制水稻立枯病的作用效果研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2026, 32(1): 113-117.