水稻抗倒伏性评价方法及机理的研究现状与展望

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.02.003

中国稻米 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 12-17.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.02.003

水稻抗倒伏性评价方法及机理的研究现状与展望

欧阳慧¹^,²^,^#, 杨贤莉¹^,⁴^,^#, 王立志¹^,⁴, 张天驰¹^,², 迟力勇¹, 赵茜¹, 张喜娟¹^,⁴, 李明贤¹, 李忠杰¹, 李锐¹, 孙兵¹, 武小霞², 吴立仁³, 吕国依¹, 姜树坤¹^,⁴()

1.黑龙江省农业科学院耕作栽培研究所/黑龙江省作物生理生态重点实验室/黑龙江省寒地农作物低温冷害工程技术研究中心，哈尔滨 150086
2.东北农业大学农学院，哈尔滨 150086
3.黑龙江省农业科学院经济作物研究所，哈尔滨 150086
4.国家耐盐碱水稻技术创新中心东北中心，哈尔滨 150086

收稿日期:2022-11-21 出版日期:2023-03-20 发布日期:2023-03-14
通讯作者: *shukunjiang@haas.cn
作者简介:^#共同第一作者
基金资助:
黑龙江省省属科研院所科研业务费(CZKYF2021B009);国家自然科学基金(32071889);黑龙江省农业创新工程(2018YYYF015);黑龙江省农业创新工程(2020CQJC002);黑龙江省农业创新工程(2020FJZX049);黑龙江省农业创新工程(2020FJZX033);黑龙江省农业创新工程(2021QKPY009);黑龙江省农业创新工程(2021CQJC003)

Research Advances and Prospects of Evaluation Methods and Mechanisms of Rice Lodging Resistance

OUYANG Hui¹^,²^,^#, YANG Xianli¹^,⁴^,^#, WANG Lizhi¹^,⁴, ZHANG TianChi¹^,², CHI Liyong¹, ZHAO Qian¹, ZHANG Xijuan¹^,⁴, LI Mingxian¹, LI Zhongjie¹, LI Rui¹, SUN Bing¹, WU Xiaoxia², WU Liren³, LV Guoyi¹, JIANG Shukun¹^,⁴()

1. Institute of Crop Cultivation and Tillage，Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology in Cold Region/Heilongjiang Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Crop Cold Damage, Harbin 150086, China
2. College of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150086, China
3. Institute of Economic Crops, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, China
4. Northeast Branch of National Salt-Alkali Tolerant Rice Technology Innovation Center, Harbin 150086, China

Received:2022-11-21 Online:2023-03-20 Published:2023-03-14
Contact: *shukunjiang@haas.cn
About author:^#Co-first author

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

倒伏是影响水稻生产的主要限制因素之一。倒伏后群体冠层结构遭到破坏，叶片光合速率锐减，同时群体内部湿度增加诱发真菌性病害和穗发芽，进而影响稻米品质和产量。本文综述了水稻倒伏的评价方法和诱发原因、抗倒伏能力与茎秆理化特性的关系、抗倒伏基因的挖掘及功能研究等方面的研究进展，比较分析了不同水稻倒伏评价方法的特点，分析了株型等形态性状、氮肥运筹、种植密度、种植方式以及大风、暴雨、臭氧等环境因素对水稻倒伏的影响，归纳了纤维素含量、木质素含量以及维管束数目等茎秆物理特性及化学成分与水稻倒伏的关系，总结了矮化相关基因和纤维素合成相关基因参与水稻抗倒伏的调控机制。此外，文章展望了未来水稻抗倒伏研究方向，并提出一些建议：（1）创新和优化水稻倒伏评价体系；（2）挖掘鉴定新的抗倒伏基因，强化水稻抗倒伏的机理研究；（3）选育抗倒伏水稻品种；（4）根据品种、栽培条件和气候环境等因素制定倒伏综合应对措施。

关键词: 水稻, 倒伏, 评价方法, 诱发原因, 抗倒机理

Abstract:

Lodging is one of the main limiting factors affecting rice production. It can damage the canopy structure, decrease the leaf photosynthesis rate and increase the population humidity. These undesirable factors could induce fungal diseases, cause spike germination, and then affect the quality and the yield of grain. This paper reviewed the research status of the evaluation methods of rice lodging and inducing causes, the relationship between lodging resistance and the physical and chemical properties of the stem, and the identification and functional study of lodging resistance genes. We compared the characteristics of different rice lodging evaluation methods, analyzed the effects of plant type, field managements including nitrogen fertilizer management, planting density and planting methods, and environmental factors including the gale, rainstorm, and ozone on lodging, summarized the effects of the physical properties and chemical components of stems including cellulose content, lignin content and the number of vascular bundle on lodging, concluded the regulation mechanism of dwarf related genes and cellulose synthesis related genes involved in lodging resistance in rice. In addition, we prospect the future research on lodging resistance and put forward some research suggestions: (1) Innovating and optimizing the evaluation system of rice lodging; (2) Identifying new lodging resistance genes and strengthening the mechanism research of rice lodging resistance; (3) Breeding lodging resistance rice varieties; (4) According to the factors of varieties, cultivation conditions and climate environment, formulating the comprehensive response measures of lodging.

Key words: rice, lodging, evaluation method, inducing causes, lodging resistance mechanism

中图分类号:

S511.04

欧阳慧, 杨贤莉, 王立志, 张天驰, 迟力勇, 赵茜, 张喜娟, 李明贤, 李忠杰, 李锐, 孙兵, 武小霞, 吴立仁, 吕国依, 姜树坤. 水稻抗倒伏性评价方法及机理的研究现状与展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(2): 12-17.

OUYANG Hui, YANG Xianli, WANG Lizhi, ZHANG TianChi, CHI Liyong, ZHAO Qian, ZHANG Xijuan, LI Mingxian, LI Zhongjie, LI Rui, SUN Bing, WU Xiaoxia, WU Liren, LV Guoyi, JIANG Shukun. Research Advances and Prospects of Evaluation Methods and Mechanisms of Rice Lodging Resistance[J]. China Rice, 2023, 29(2): 12-17.

图/表 3

参考文献 61

[1]	江云珠, 沈希宏, 曹立勇. 水稻茎秆性状的研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2012, 18(2):1-7.
[2]	李文熙. 水稻倒伏的原因及减轻危害的对策[J]. 韩国作物学会纪事, 1991, 36(5):383-393.
[3]	松江勇次. 移栽和倒伏时期对稻米食味理化特性的影响[J]. 日本作物学会纪事, 1991, 60(4):490-496.
[4]	胡继松, 彭伟正, 庞伯良, 等. 水稻抗倒伏性及评价指标体系研究进展[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2011(13):41-44.
[5]	WANG D F, QIN Y L, FANG J J, et al. A missense mutation in the zinc finger domain of OsCESA7 deleteriously affects cellulose biosynthesis and plant growth in rice[J]. PloS One, 2016, 11(4): e0153993.
[6]	ISHIMARU K, TOGAWA E, OOKAWA T, et al. New target for rice lodging resistance and its effect in a typhoon[J]. Planta. 2008, 227:601-609. PMID
[7]	刘畅, 李来庚. 水稻抗倒伏性状的分子机理研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(2):216-222.
[8]	袁志华, 赵安庆, 苏宗伟, 等. 水稻茎秆抗倒伏的力学分析[J]. 生物数学学报, 2003, 18(2):234-237.
[9]	邓文, 青先国, 马国辉, 等. 水稻抗倒伏研究进展[J]. 杂交水稻, 2006, 21(6):6-10.
[10]	华泽田, 郝宪彬, 沈枫, 等. 东北地区超级杂交粳稻倒伏性状的研究[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2003, 34(3):161-164.
[11]	田保明, 杨光圣. 农作物倒伏及其评价方法[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(7):111-114.
[12]	房贤涛, 何花榕, 谢祖钦, 等. 不同施氮量对杂交稻茎秆性状及抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 福建农业学报, 2016, 31(10):1034-1 038.
[13]	KASHIWAGI T, ISHIMARU K. Identification and functional analysis of a locus for improvement of lodging resistance in rice[J]. Plant Physiology, 2004(134): 676-683.
[14]	肖应辉, 罗丽华, 闫晓燕, 等. 水稻品种倒伏指数QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(3):348-354.
[15]	林泽川, 曹立勇. 水稻株型相关基因的定位与克隆研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2014, 20(1):22-27.
[16]	马均, 马文波, 田彦华, 等. 重穗型水稻植株抗倒伏能力的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(2):143-148.
[17]	张喜娟, 李红娇, 李伟娟, 等. 北方直立穗型粳稻抗倒性的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(7):2305-2 313.
[18]	张明聪, 刘元英, 罗盛国, 等. 养分综合管理对寒地水稻抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(21):4536-4 542.
[19]	杨世民, 谢力, 郑顺林, 等. 氮肥水平和栽插密度对杂交稻茎秆理化特性与抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(1):93-103.
[20]	闫川, 丁艳锋, 王强盛, 等. 行株距配置对水稻茎秆形态生理与群体生态的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(5):530-536.
[21]	XU J W, MENG T Y, JING P P, et al. Effect of mechanical-transplanting density on lodging resistance and yield in different types of rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(11): 1767.
[22]	DUY P Q, ABE A, HIRANO M, et al. Analysis of lodging-resistant characteristics of different rice genotypes grown under the standard and nitrogen-free basal dressing accompanied with sparse planting density practices[J]. Plant Production Science, 2004, 7(3): 243-251.
[23]	李杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 等. 不同种植方式对超级稻植株抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(11):2234-23 43.
[24]	刘立军, 袁莉民, 王志琴, 等. 旱种水稻倒伏生理原因分析与对策的初步研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2002, 16(3):28-33.
[25]	郝树荣, 潘永春, 董博豪, 等. 灌排模式对超级稻南粳5055抗倒伏能力的影响研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2019, 38(3):15-21.
[26]	齐龙昌, 周桂香. 水稻抗倒伏性状影响因素研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(9):19-22+5.
[27]	OKAWA S, MAKINO A, MAE T. Effect of irradiance on the partitioning of assimilated carbon during the early phase of grain filling in rice[J]. Annals of Botany, 2003, 92(3): 357-364. PMID
[28]	MASAHIRO Y, NISHI Y, KAWADA S, et al. Tropospheric ozone reduces resistance of japonica rice (Oryza sativa L., cv. Koshihikari) to lodging[J]. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 2018, 74(3): 97-101.
[29]	龚金龙, 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 等. 籼、粳超级稻茎秆抗倒支撑特征的差异研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(3):273-281.
[30]	雷小龙, 刘利, 刘波, 等. 杂交籼稻F优498机械化种植的茎秆理化性状与抗倒伏性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(6):612-620.
[31]	ZHANG B C, ZHOU Y H. Rice brittleness mutants: A way to open the ‘black box’ of monocot cell wall biosynthesis[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2011, 53(2): 136-142.
[32]	袁新捷, 刘潇, 陈国兴. 水稻核心种质资源茎秆抗倒伏性研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2021, 40(1):147-153.
[33]	罗茂春, 田翠婷, 李晓娟, 等. 水稻茎秆形态结构特征和化学成分与抗倒伏关系综述[J]. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27(11):2346 -2 353.
[34]	潘俊峰, 李国辉, 崔克辉. 水稻茎鞘非结构性碳水化合物再分配及其在稳产和抗逆中的作用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(4):335-342.
[35]	张丰转, 金正勋, 马国辉, 等. 灌浆成熟期粳稻抗倒伏性和茎鞘化学成分含量的动态变化[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2010, 24(3):264-270.
[36]	HUANG D B, WANG S G, ZHANG B C, et al. A gibberellin-mediated DELLA-NAC signaling regulates cellulose synthesis in rice[J]. The Plant Cell, 2015, 27(6): 1 681-1 696.
[37]	MURAI M, KOMAZAKI T, SATO S. Effects of sd1 and Ur1(undulate rachis-1) on lodging resistance and related traits in rice[J]. Breeding Science, 2004, 54: 333-340.
[38]	MULSANTI I W, YAMAMOTO T, UEDA T, et al. Finding the superior allele of japonica-type for increasing stem lodging resistance in indica rice varieties using chromosome segment substitution lines[J]. Rice, 2018(11): 25.
[39]	LIU C, ZHENG S, GUI J S, et al. Shortened basal internodes encodes a gibberellin 2-oxidase and contributes to lodging resistance in rice[J]. Molecular Plant, 2018(11): 288-299.
[40]	张保才, 周奕华. 植物细胞壁形成机制的新进展[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2015, 45(6):544-556.
[41]	LI F C, XIE G S, HUANG J F, et al. OsCESA9 conserved-site mutation leads to largely enhanced plant lodging resistance and biomass enzymatic saccharification by reducing cellulose DP and crystallinity in rice[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2017,(15): 1 093-1 104.
[42]	XIONG G Y, LI R, QIAN Q, et al. The rice dynamin-related protein DRP2B mediates membrane trafficking, and thereby plays a critical role in secondary cell wall cellulose biosynthesis[J]. The Plant Journal, 2010, 64(1): 56-70.
[43]	舒亚洲, 曾冬冬, 秦冉, 等. 水稻脆秆突变体Bc6的鉴定和基因精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(4):345-355.
[44]	WU B, ZHANG B C, DAI Y, et al. Brittle Culm15 encodes a membrane-associated chitinase-like protein required for cellulose biosynthesis in rice[J]. Plant Physiology, 2012, 159(4): 1 440-1 452.
[45]	FAN C F, LI Y, HU Z, et al. Ectopic expression of a novel OsExtensin-like gene consistently enhances plant lodging resistance by regulating cell elongation and cell wall thickening in rice[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2018(16): 254-263.
[46]	ZHANG M, ZHANG B C, QIAN Q, et al. Brittle Culm 12, a dual-targeting kinesin-4 protein, controls cell-cycle progression and wall properties in rice[J]. The Plant Journal, 2010, 63(2): 312-328. PMID
[47]	KASHIWAGI T, MUNAKATA J, ISHIMARU K. Functional analysis of the lodging resistance QTL BSUC11 on morphological and chemical characteristics in upper culms of rice[J]. Euphytica, 2016, 210: 233-243.
[48]	YANG C H, LI D Y, LIU X, et al. OsMYB103L, an R2R3-MYB transcription factor, influences leaf rolling and mechanical strength in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2014, 14(1):
[49]	赵明珠, 王青营, 孙健, 等. 水稻直立穗型基因DEP1研究进展[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2017, 47(10):1036-1 042.
[50]	KASHIWAGA T, HIROTAU N, UJIIE K, et al. Lodging resistance locus prl5 improves physical strength of the lower plant part under different conditions of fertilization in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Field Crops Research, 2010, 115: 107-115.
[51]	ISHIMARU K, TOGAWA E, OOKAWA T, et al. New target for rice lodging resistance and its effect in a typhoon[J]. Planta, 2008, 227(3): 601-609. PMID
[52]	CUI Y T, HU X M, LIANG G H, et al. Production of novel beneficial alleles of a rice yield‐related QTL by CRISPR/Cas9[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2020, doi:10.1111/pbi.13370.
[53]	HIRANO K, AYA K H, KONDO M, et al. OsCAD2 is the major CAD gene responsible for monolignol biosynthesis in rice culm.[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2012, 31(1):
[54]	OOKAWA T, HOBO T, YANO M, et al. New approach for rice improvement using a pleiotropic QTL gene for lodging resistance and yield[J]. Nature Communications, 2010(1): 132.
[55]	JIAO Y Q, WANG Y H, XUE D W, et al. Regulation of OsSPL14 by OsmiR156 defines ideal plant architecture in rice[J]. Nature Genetics, 2010, 42(6): 541-4.
[56]	TU B, ZHANG T, WANG S G, et al. Loss of Gn1a/OsCKX2 confers heavy-panicle rice with excellent lodging resistance[J]. Journal of Integerative Plant Biology, 2021, 64(1): 23-38.
[57]	OOKAWA T, INOUE K, MATSUOKA M, et al. Increased lodging resistance in long-culm, low-lignin gh2 rice for improved feed and bioenergy production[J]. Scientific Reports, 2014(4): 65-67.
[58]	史占忠, 王晓明. 水稻倒伏原因及防御技术措施[J]. 北方水稻, 2014, 44(4):56-58.
[59]	HEDDEN P. The genes of the green revolution[J]. Trends in Genetics, 2003, 19(1): 5-9. PMID
[60]	MA G H, YUAN L P. Hybrid rice achievements, development and prospect in China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(2): 197-205.
[61]	KASHIWAGI T, SASAKI H, ISHIMARU K. Factors responsible for decreasing sturdiness of the lower part in lodging of rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Plant Production Science, 2005, 8(2): 166-172.

水稻抗倒伏性评价方法及机理的研究现状与展望

Research Advances and Prospects of Evaluation Methods and Mechanisms of Rice Lodging Resistance

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 61

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王岩, 王旺, 蔡嘉鑫, 曾鑫, 倪新华, 田洁, 唐闯, 景秀, 周苗, 王晶, 徐昊, 胡雅杰, 邢志鹏, 郭保卫, 许轲, 张洪程. 氮肥对稻米淀粉结构及理化性质影响的研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 1-8.
[2]	胡江博, 任正鹏, 丁翔, 王朝全, 冯阳, 王笑见, 张翔, 胥南飞. 稻田除草剂应用现状与抗除草剂水稻育种研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 13-19.
[3]	王云翔, 咸云宇, 赵灿, 王维领, 霍中洋. 缓控释氮肥施用技术在水稻上应用研究进展与展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 20-26.
[4]	李逸翔, 周新桥, 陈达刚, 郭洁, 陈可, 张容郡, 饶刚顺, 刘传光, 陈友订. 高γ-氨基丁酸水稻及其米制食品开发应用研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 38-44.
[5]	薛莲, 段圣省, 郑兴飞, 殷得所, 董华林, 胡建林, 王红波, 查中萍, 郭英, 曹鹏, 徐得泽. 湖北省水稻生产发展现状及对策建议[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 45-47.
[6]	王昕, 刘炜, 马洪文, 贺奇, 冯伟东, 张益民, 李虹, 殷延勃. 宁夏优质稻育种历程、问题及展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 48-52.
[7]	孙志广, 刘艳, 李景芳, 周振玲, 邢运高, 徐波, 周群, 王德荣, 卢百关, 方兆伟, 王宝祥, 徐大勇. 水稻萌发耐淹性鉴定评价方法研究及种质资源筛选[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 53-58.
[8]	王兴为, 王志成. 秸秆还田与深施氮肥对水稻叶片生理特征、氮素利用及产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 59-65.
[9]	赫兵, 李超, 严永峰, 刘月月, 赫靖淇, 于天华, 王帅, 陈殿元, 严光彬. 水稻秸秆秋季水耙浆还田对土壤及水稻性状的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 66-71.
[10]	董维, 张建平, 邓伟, 徐雨然, 奎丽梅, 涂建, 张建华, 安华, 王睿, 谷安宇, 张锦文, 吕莹, 杨丽萍, 管俊娇, 陈忆昆, 李小林. 云南省1983—2021年审定水稻品种基本特性分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 84-89.
[11]	吴涛, 邓宏中, 赵迎曦, 杨琛, 郭昱, 赵有权, 谢志梅, 张立阳, 杨远柱. 隆平高科水稻绿色通道2016—2021年审定品种分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 90-94.
[12]	邵泽毅, 谭旭生, 伍斌, 管恩相. 稻田小龙虾轮捕轮放寄养技术浅析[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 98-100.
[13]	黄日伟, 廖春良, 梁月宽, 杨绍意, 尚子帅, 姚云峰. 华浙优261在广西不同海拔作早中晚稻种植表现及高产栽培技术[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 106-107.
[14]	郑红明, 郑品卉. 浅析稻谷比价偏低对我国水稻产业的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 32-37.
[15]	严如玉, 甘国渝, 赵希梅, 殷大聪, 李燕丽, 金慧芳, 朱海, 李继福. 我国水稻优势产区生产格局及施肥现状研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(3): 1-8.