盐害和干旱影响水稻根系形态生理和产量形成及其机制研究进展

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.03.006

中国稻米 ›› 2023, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 34-40.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2023.03.006

盐害和干旱影响水稻根系形态生理和产量形成及其机制研究进展

朱旺¹^,², 张徐彬¹, 耿孝宇¹, 陈英龙¹, 戴其根¹^,², 周桂生², 韦还和¹, 孟天瑶²^,^*()

¹江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室/江苏省作物栽培生理重点实验室/江苏省粮食作物现代产业技术协同创新中心/扬州大学水稻产业工程技术研究院/农业农村部盐碱土改良与利用（滨海盐碱地）重点实验室，江苏扬州 225009
²扬州大学农业科技发展研究院/扬州大学教育部农业与农产品安全国际合作联合实验室，江苏扬州 225009

收稿日期:2022-11-26 出版日期:2023-05-20 发布日期:2023-05-23
通讯作者: 孟天瑶
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(32001466);国家自然科学基金(31901448);国家重点研发计划(2022YFE0113400);中国博士后基金面上项目(2020M671628);中国博士后基金面上项目(2020M671629);江苏省碳达峰碳中和科技创新专项资金(BE2022304);江苏省碳达峰碳中和科技创新专项资金(BE2022305);江苏省高校优势学科建设工程项目(PAPD)

Research Progresses on the Mechanism of Salinity and Drought Affecting Root Morpho-physiology and Yield Formation of Rice

ZHU Wang¹^,², ZHANG Xubin¹, GENG Xiaoyu¹, CHEN Yinglong¹, DAI Qigen¹^,², ZHOU Guisheng², WEI Huanhe¹, MENG Tianyao²^,^*()

¹Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology/Jiangsu Grain Crop Modern Industrial Technology Collaborative Innovation Center/Rice Industry Engineering Technology Research Institute, Yangzhou University/Key Laboratory of Saline-Alkali Soil Reclamation and Utilization in Coastal Areas, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China
²Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology Development/Joint Laboratory of International Cooperation on Agriculture and Agricultural Product Safety for Ministry of Education and Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China

Received:2022-11-26 Online:2023-05-20 Published:2023-05-23
Contact: MENG Tianyao

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

我国正大力开发利用沿海滩涂发展水稻生产，但受限于淡水资源和水利基础设施，在生产过程中盐害和干旱往往交织出现，极易遭受盐-旱复合胁迫，严重制约了沿海滩涂水稻高产稳产目标的实现。根系是植物感受盐害和干旱逆境的首要器官，也是最主要和最直接的受害部位。全面理解盐害、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻根系形态、生理的影响及其与稻谷产量形成的内在关联，可为沿海滩涂水稻高产栽培提供科学支撑。本文概述了盐害、干旱和盐-旱复合胁迫对水稻根系形态结构、生理活性和产量形成的影响，从渗透调节、离子平衡、光合作用、抗氧化酶系统和内源激素等方面阐述其影响水稻根系生长发育和产量形成的作用机制，探讨了缓解水稻盐害、干旱胁迫的调控措施，最后对下一步深入开展盐-旱复合胁迫对水稻根系生长和产量形成的研究提出建议。

关键词: 水稻, 盐胁迫, 干旱胁迫, 复合胁迫, 根系

Abstract:

At present, China is vigorously developing and utilizing coastal beaches to promote rice production. The rice production along the coastal beach is limited by freshwater resources and water conservancy infrastructure, which resulted in salinity-drought combined stress and seriously restricts the realization of the goal of a high and stable yield of rice in coastal beaches. The root system is the primary organ for plants to perceive salinity damage and drought stress, which is also the most important and direct damaged part. A comprehensive understanding of the effects of salinity damage, drought stress, and their combined stress on rice root morphology and physiology and their internal relationship with yield formation can provide scientific support for high-yield rice cultivation in coastal beaches. This paper summarized the effects of salinity damage, drought stress, and their combined stress on the morphological structure, physiological activity, and yield formation of rice roots, expounded the mechanism of their effects on rice root growth and yield formation from the aspects of osmotic regulation, ion balance, photosynthesis, antioxidant enzyme system, and endogenous hormones, and discussed the regulatory measures to alleviate rice salinity damage and drought stress. Finally, some suggestions were put forward for further research on the effects of salinity-drought combined stress on rice root growth and yield formation in the future.

Key words: rice, salinity stress, drought stress, salinity-drought combined stress, root

中图分类号:

S511

朱旺, 张徐彬, 耿孝宇, 陈英龙, 戴其根, 周桂生, 韦还和, 孟天瑶. 盐害和干旱影响水稻根系形态生理和产量形成及其机制研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(3): 34-40.

ZHU Wang, ZHANG Xubin, GENG Xiaoyu, CHEN Yinglong, DAI Qigen, ZHOU Guisheng, WEI Huanhe, MENG Tianyao. Research Progresses on the Mechanism of Salinity and Drought Affecting Root Morpho-physiology and Yield Formation of Rice[J]. China Rice, 2023, 29(3): 34-40.

参考文献 99

[1]	SHAAR-MOSHE L, BLUMWALD E, PELEG Z. Unique physiological and transcriptional shifts under combinations of salinity, drought, and heat[J]. Plant Physiology, 2017, 174(1): 421-434.
[2]	WEN W, TIMMERMANS J, CHEN Q, et al. A review of remote sensing challenges for food security with respect to salinity and drought threats[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, doi: 10.3390/rs13010006.
[3]	LI X K, GUO Z L, LV Y, et al. Genetic control of the root system in rice under normal and drought stress conditions by genome-wide association study[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2017, 13(7): 12-15.
[4]	MA Y, DIAS M C, FREITAS H. Drought and salinity stress responses and microbe-induced tolerance in plants[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.591911.
[5]	MENG T Y, ZHANG X B, GE J L, et al. Agronomic and physiological traits facilitating better yield performance of japonica/indica hybrids in saline fields[J]. Field Crops Research, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108255.
[6]	李婷婷, 冯钰枫, 朱安, 等. 主要节水灌溉方式对水稻根系形态生理的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(4):293-302.
[7]	LIU Q, LIANG Z, FENG D, et al. Transcriptional landscape of rice roots at the single-cell resolution[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2021, 14(3): 384 -394.
[8]	DOMEC J C, KING J S, CARMICHAEL M J, et al. Aquaporins, and not changes in root structure, provide new insights into physiological responses to drought, flooding, and salinity[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2021, 72(12): 4 489-4 501.
[9]	CHEN Y, LI S Y, ZHANG Y J, et al. Rice root morphological and physiological traits interaction with rhizosphere soil and its effect on methane emissions in paddy fields[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 129(18): 191-200.
[10]	ZOU Y T, ZHANG Y X, TESTERINK C. Root dynamic growth strategies in response to salinity[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2022, 45(3): 695-704.
[11]	袁泽斌, 牟昌红, 欧阳秀琴, 等. 混合盐胁迫对马蔺幼苗根系构型及生长量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(16):55-60.
[12]	CHEN T X, SHABALA S, NIU Y N, et al. Molecular mechanisms of salinity tolerance in rice[J]. The Crop Journal, 2021, 9(3): 506-520.
[13]	徐芬芬, 韦蓉香. NAA对盐胁迫下水稻根系生长的缓解效应[J]. 杂交水稻, 2020, 35(2):75-77.
[14]	郑旭, 杨志鑫, 郝东梅, 等. 盐碱地食叶草细根对干旱复水后的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(1):240-249.
[15]	徐芬芬, 彦有娟, 韦蓉香. NaCl和Na₂CO₃胁迫对水稻根系生长的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2020, 35(3):76-78.
[16]	HUSSAIN S, ZHANG J H, ZHONG C, et al. Effects of salt stress on rice growth development characteristics and the regulating ways: A review[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017, 16(11): 2 357-2 374.
[17]	SHHANA B, SURBHI K, ALOK K, et al. Nitro-oxidative stress induces the formation of roots' corticalaerenchyma in rice under osmotic stress[J]. Plant Sciences, 2021, 172(2): 936-975.
[18]	DEBABRATA P, SWATIC S M, PRAFULLA K B. Drought tolerance in rice: Focus on recent mechanisms and approaches[J]. Rice Science, 2021, 28(2): 119-132.
[19]	补红英, 宋维周, 曹凑贵, 等. 节水抗旱稻旱优113号的根系生长对土壤水分亏缺的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(22):4277-4 289.
[20]	LEE D K, CHUNG P J, JEONG S J, et al. The rice OsNAC6 transcription factor orchestrates multiple molecular mechanisms involving root structural adaptions and nicotianamine biosynthesis for drought tolerance[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2017, 15(6): 754-764.
[21]	CHENG B, HU S L, CAO M L, et al. Nitrate application induced a lower yield loss in rice under progressive drought stress[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2021, 95(2): 149-156.
[22]	刘亚文, 张红燕, 曹丹, 等. 基于多平台基因表达数据的水稻干旱和盐胁迫相关基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12):2423-2 439.
[23]	XU N, CHU Y L, CHEN H L, et al. Rice transcription factor OsMADS25 modulates root growth and confers salinity tolerance via the ABA-mediated regulatory pathway and ROS scavenging[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2018, doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007662.
[24]	SOLIS C A, YONG M T, VINARAO R, et al. Back to the wild: On a quest for donors toward salinity tolerant rice[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00323.
[25]	王洋, 张瑞, 刘永昊, 等. 水稻对盐胁迫的响应及耐盐机理研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(2):105-117.
[26]	黄洁, 白志刚, 钟楚, 等. 水稻耐盐生理及分子调节机制[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(6):1359-1 367.
[27]	HOANG T M L, TRAN T N, NGUYEN T K T, et al. Improvement of salinity stress tolerance in rice: Challenges and opportunities[J]. Agronomy, 2016, 6(4): 54.
[28]	侯丹平, 谭金松, 毕庆宇, 等. 水分胁迫对节水抗旱稻产量形成和根系形态生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(1):27-37.
[29]	段骅, 唐琪, 剧成欣, 等. 抽穗灌浆早期高温与干旱对不同水稻品种产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(22):4561-4 573.
[30]	明东风, 袁红梅, 王玉海, 等. 水分胁迫下硅对水稻苗期根系生理生化性状的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(12):2510-2 519.
[31]	路凯, 陈涛, 姚姝, 等. 盐胁迫下四个水稻类受体蛋白激酶的功能分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(2):103-111.
[32]	章怡兰, 林雪, 吴仪, 等. 水稻根系遗传育种研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2020, 55(3):382-393.
[33]	韦还和, 张徐彬, 葛佳琳, 等. 盐胁迫对水稻颖花形成及籽粒充实的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12):2471-2480.
[34]	周根友, 翟彩娇, 邓先亮. 盐逆境对水稻产量、光合特性及品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(2):146-154.
[35]	韦还和, 葛佳琳, 张徐彬, 等. 盐胁迫下粳稻品种南粳9108 分蘖特性及其与群体生产力的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(8):1238-1 247.
[36]	ROGERS E D, BENFERY P N. Regulation of plant root system architecture: implications for crop advancement[J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2015, 32: 93-98. PMID
[37]	杨晓龙, 程建平, 汪本福, 等. 灌浆期干旱胁迫对水稻生理性状和产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(1):38-46.
[38]	SIMRAN J S, RACHAN S. Differential regulation of drought stress by biological membrane transporters and channels[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2021, 40(8): 1 565-1 583.
[39]	丁雷, 李英瑞, 李勇, 等. 梯度干旱胁迫对水稻叶片光合和水分状况的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(1):65-70.
[40]	HE W J, YAN K, ZHANG Y, et al. Contrasting photosynthesis, photoinhibition and oxidative damage in honeysuckle(Lonicera japonica Thunb.) under iso-osmotic salt and drought stresses[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2021, 182: 104313.
[41]	张桂云, 朱静雯, 孙明法, 等. 盐胁迫条件下长白10号水稻籽粒中差异代谢物的分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(4):675-683.
[42]	LIU J, SHABALA S, ZHANG J, et al. Melatonin improves rice salinity stress tolerance by NADPH oxidase-dependent control of the plasma membrane K⁺ transporters and K⁺ homeostasis[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2020, 43(11): 2 591-2 605.
[43]	YANG Y Q, GUO Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses[J]. New Phytologist, 2018, 217(2): 523-539. PMID
[44]	李玉祥, 林海荣, 梁倩, 等. 多巴胺引发对盐胁迫下水稻种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5):487-494.
[45]	孙晓莉, 贾春燕, 田寿乐, 等. 外源甲基乙二醛对干旱胁迫下板栗幼苗的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1):104-110.
[46]	SHAN C, WANG Y. Exogenous salicylic acid-induced nitric oxide regulates leaf water condition through root osmoregulation of maize seedlings under drought stress[J]. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 2017, 40(2): 591-597.
[47]	杨瑰丽, 杨美娜, 陈志强, 等. 水稻抗旱机理和抗旱育种研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(21):1-6.
[48]	董桃杏, 蔡昆争, 曾任森. 干旱胁迫下茉莉酸甲酯对水稻叶片质膜透性及无机离子含量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2010, 25(1):136-140.
[49]	宋凝曦, 李霞, 王净, 等. 大环内酯类和高表达玉米C₄-PEPC基因对水稻耐旱性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(10):1927-1 940.
[50]	梁银培, 孙健, 索艺宁, 等. 水稻耐盐性和耐碱性相关性状的QTL定位及环境互作分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(10):1747-1 762.
[51]	WANG X X, WANG W C, HUANG J L, et al. Diffusional conductance to CO₂ is the key limitation tophotosynthesis in salt-stressed leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2018, 163(1): 45-58.
[52]	徐晨, 刘晓龙, 李前, 等. 供氮水平对盐胁迫下水稻叶片光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2018, 53(2):185-195.
[53]	朱永兴, 夏雨晨, 刘乐承, 等. 外源硅对植物抗盐性影响的研究进展[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(3):498-509.
[54]	段骅, 佟卉, 刘燕清, 等. 高温和干旱对水稻的影响及其机制的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(3):206-218.
[55]	WUNGRAMPHA S, JOSHI R, SINGLA-PAREEK S L, et al. Photosynthesis and salinity: Are these mutually exclusive?[J]. Photosynthetica, 2018, 56: 366-381.
[56]	蔡一霞, 黄泽双, 朱海涛, 等. 用单片段代换系研究水稻产量和籽粒充实对花后不同土壤干旱的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(5):868-877.
[57]	LIU M, LIU X C, ZHAO Y, et al. Sex-specific nitrogen allocation tradeoffs in the leaves of Populus cathayana cuttings under salt and drought stress[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2022, 172(2): 101-110.
[58]	KAZEMII S, ESHGHIZADEH H R, ZAHEDI M. Responses of four rice varieties to elevated CO₂ and different salinity levels[J]. Rice Science, 2018, 25(3): 142-151.
[59]	CHEN Y L, LI R K, GE J F, et al. Exogenous melatonin confers enhanced salinity tolerance in rice by blocking the ROS burst and improving Na⁺/K⁺ homeostasis[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104530
[60]	YAN F Y, WEI H M, DING Y F, et al. Melatonin regulates antioxidant strategy in response to continuous salt stress in rice seedlings[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2021, 165: 239-250. PMID
[61]	向警, 黄倩, 鞠春燕, 等. 外源褪黑素对盐胁迫下水稻种子萌发与幼苗生长的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2021, 57(2):393-401.
[62]	WANG Y Y, ZHAO H, QIN H, et al. The synthesis of ascorbic acid in rice roots plays an important role in the salt tolerance of rice by scavenging ROS[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijms19113347.
[63]	SWAPNA S, SHYLARAJ K S. Screening for osmotic stress responses in rice varieties under drought condition[J]. Rice Science, 2017, 24(5): 253-263.
[64]	冯红玉, 张璐璐, 陈惠萍. 外源乙酸对水稻幼苗根系干旱胁迫的缓解效应[J]. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(2):209-218.
[65]	XIONG H Y, YU J P, MIAO J L, et al. Natural variation in OsLG3 increases drought tolerance in rice by inducing ROS scavenging[J]. Plant Physiology, 2018, 178(1): 451-467.
[66]	HUSSAIN S, ZHONG C, BAI Z G, et al. Effects of 1-methylcyclopropene on rice growth characteristics and superior and inferior spikelet development under salt stress[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2018, 37(4): 1 368-1 384.
[67]	LIU L, XIA W L, LI H X, et al. Salinity inhibits rice seed germination by reducing α-amylase activity via decreased bioactive gibberellin content[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00275.
[68]	沙汉景, 胡文成, 贾琰, 等. 外源水杨酸、脯氨酸和γ-氨基丁酸对盐胁迫下水稻产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(11):1677-1 688.
[69]	李斌, 黄进, 王丽, 等. 环境胁迫及相关植物激素在水稻根毛发育过程中的作用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(4):287-299.
[70]	CHOUDHARY P, PRAMITHA L, RANA S, et al. Hormonal crosstalk in regulating salinity stress tolerance in graminaceous crops[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2021, 173(4): 1 587-1 596.
[71]	ULLAH F, XU Q T, ZHOU D X. Histone deacetylase HDA710 controls salt tolerance by regulating ABA signaling in rice[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2021, 63(3): 451-467.
[72]	郭贵华, 刘海艳, 李刚华, 等. ABA缓解水稻孕穗期干旱胁迫生理特性的分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(22):4380-4 391.
[73]	SHARMA L, DALAL M, VERMA R K, et al. Auxin protects spikelet fertility and grain yield under drought and heat stresses in rice[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2018, 150: 9-24.
[74]	陈悦, 孙明哲, 贾博为, 等. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4):781-790.
[75]	井文, 章文华. 水稻耐盐基因定位与克隆及品种耐盐性分子标记辅助选择改良研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(2):111-123.
[76]	GANIE S A, MOLLA K A, HENRY R J, et al. Advances in understanding salt tolerance in rice[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2019, 132: 851-870. PMID
[77]	LUO L J, MEI H W, YU X Q, et al. Water-saving and drought-resistance rice: From the concept to practice and theory[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11032-019-1057-5.
[78]	LUO L J. Breeding for water-saving and drought-resistance rice (WDR) in China[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2010, 61(13): 3 509-3 517.
[79]	孙现军, 姜奇彦, 胡正, 等. 水稻资源全生育期耐盐性鉴定筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(11):1656-1 663.
[80]	YUAN J, WANG X Q, ZHAO Y, et al. Genetic basis and identification of candidate genes for salt tolerance in rice by GWAS[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66604-7.
[81]	罗利军. 节水抗旱稻的培育与产业发展[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(5):14-19.
[82]	PARK Y C, LIM S D, MOON J C, et al. A rice really interesting new gene H2-type E3 ligase, OsSIRH2-14, enhances salinity tolerance via ubiquitin/26S proteasome-mediated degradation of salt-related proteins[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2019, 42(11): 3 061-3 076.
[83]	XIONG H Y, YU J P, MIAO J L, et al. Natural variation in OsLG3 increases drought tolerance in rice by inducing ROS scavenging[J]. Plant Physiology, 2018, 178(1): 451-467.
[84]	TANG Y H, BAO X X, ZHI Y L, et al. Overexpression of a MYB family gene, OsMYB6, increases drought and salinity stress tolerance in transgenic rice[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00168.
[85]	HU Q Y, LIU T Q, JIANG S S, et al. Combined effects of straw returning and chemical N fertilization on greenhouse gas emissions and yield from paddy fields in northwest Hubei Province, China[J]. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrient, 2020, 20: 392-406.
[86]	CHEN X D, OPOKU-KWANOWAA Y, LI J M, et al. Application of organic wastes to primary saline-alkali soil in Northeast China: Effects on soil available nutrients and salt ions[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2020, 51(9): 1 238-1 252.
[87]	ZHUAN Y H, ZHANG L, LI S S, et al. Effects and potential of water-saving irrigation for rice production in China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 217: 374-382.
[88]	PARK S I, KIM J J, SHIN S Y, et al. ASR enhances environmental stress tolerance and improves grain yield by modulating stomatal closure in rice[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01752.
[89]	VAN OORT P A J. Mapping abiotic stresses for rice in Africa: Drought, cold, iron toxicity, salinity and sodicity[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 219: 55-75. PMID
[90]	KUHLA J, PAUSCH J, SCHALLER J. Effect on soil water availability, rather than silicon uptake by plants, explains the beneficial effect of silicon on rice during drought[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2021, 44(10): 3 336-3 346.
[91]	李瑶, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰, 等. 调环酸钙对盐胁迫下水稻幼苗生长及抗性生理的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2021, 57(10):1897-1 906.
[92]	YOUNIS S A, El-SALAMONY R A, TSANG Y F, et al. Use of rice straw-based biochar for batch sorption of barium/strontium from saline water: Protection against scale formation in petroleum/desalination industries[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119442.
[93]	WU L P, WEI C B, ZHANG S R, et al. MgO-modified biochar increases phosphate retention and rice yields in saline-alkaline soil[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 235: 901-909.
[94]	ZHANG J H, BAI Z G, HUANG J, et al. Biochar alleviated the salt stress of induced saline paddy soil and improved the biochemical characteristics of rice seedlings differing in salt tolerance[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.still.2019.104372.
[95]	ZHENG S W, LIU S B, FENG J H, et al. Overexpression of a stress response membrane protein gene OsSMP1 enhances rice tolerance to salt, cold and heavy metal stress[J]. Environemntal and Experimental Botany, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104327.
[96]	CHOUDHARY P, PRMITHA L, RANA S, et al. Hormonal crosstalk in regulating salinity stress tolerance in graminaceous crops[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2021, 173(4): 1 587-1 596.
[97]	LUO Y L, LI W Q, HUANG C, et al. Exogenous abscisic acid coordinating leaf senescence and transport of assimilates into wheat grains under drought stress by regulating hormones homeostasis[J]. The Crop Journal, 2021, 9(4): 901-914.
[98]	CHAREESI A, DE D G B, SERGEEVA L, et al. Increased arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization reduces yield loss of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under drought[J]. Mycorrhiza, 2020, 30: 315-328.
[99]	HUSSAIN M, AHMAD S, HUSSAIN S, et al. Chapter six-Rice in saline soils: physiology, biochemistry, genetics, and management[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2018, 148: 231-287.

盐害和干旱影响水稻根系形态生理和产量形成及其机制研究进展

Research Progresses on the Mechanism of Salinity and Drought Affecting Root Morpho-physiology and Yield Formation of Rice

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 99

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王岩, 王旺, 蔡嘉鑫, 曾鑫, 倪新华, 田洁, 唐闯, 景秀, 周苗, 王晶, 徐昊, 胡雅杰, 邢志鹏, 郭保卫, 许轲, 张洪程. 氮肥对稻米淀粉结构及理化性质影响的研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 1-8.
[2]	胡江博, 任正鹏, 丁翔, 王朝全, 冯阳, 王笑见, 张翔, 胥南飞. 稻田除草剂应用现状与抗除草剂水稻育种研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 13-19.
[3]	王云翔, 咸云宇, 赵灿, 王维领, 霍中洋. 缓控释氮肥施用技术在水稻上应用研究进展与展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 20-26.
[4]	李逸翔, 周新桥, 陈达刚, 郭洁, 陈可, 张容郡, 饶刚顺, 刘传光, 陈友订. 高γ-氨基丁酸水稻及其米制食品开发应用研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 38-44.
[5]	薛莲, 段圣省, 郑兴飞, 殷得所, 董华林, 胡建林, 王红波, 查中萍, 郭英, 曹鹏, 徐得泽. 湖北省水稻生产发展现状及对策建议[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 45-47.
[6]	王昕, 刘炜, 马洪文, 贺奇, 冯伟东, 张益民, 李虹, 殷延勃. 宁夏优质稻育种历程、问题及展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 48-52.
[7]	孙志广, 刘艳, 李景芳, 周振玲, 邢运高, 徐波, 周群, 王德荣, 卢百关, 方兆伟, 王宝祥, 徐大勇. 水稻萌发耐淹性鉴定评价方法研究及种质资源筛选[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 53-58.
[8]	王兴为, 王志成. 秸秆还田与深施氮肥对水稻叶片生理特征、氮素利用及产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 59-65.
[9]	赫兵, 李超, 严永峰, 刘月月, 赫靖淇, 于天华, 王帅, 陈殿元, 严光彬. 水稻秸秆秋季水耙浆还田对土壤及水稻性状的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 66-71.
[10]	董维, 张建平, 邓伟, 徐雨然, 奎丽梅, 涂建, 张建华, 安华, 王睿, 谷安宇, 张锦文, 吕莹, 杨丽萍, 管俊娇, 陈忆昆, 李小林. 云南省1983—2021年审定水稻品种基本特性分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 84-89.
[11]	吴涛, 邓宏中, 赵迎曦, 杨琛, 郭昱, 赵有权, 谢志梅, 张立阳, 杨远柱. 隆平高科水稻绿色通道2016—2021年审定品种分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 90-94.
[12]	邵泽毅, 谭旭生, 伍斌, 管恩相. 稻田小龙虾轮捕轮放寄养技术浅析[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 98-100.
[13]	黄日伟, 廖春良, 梁月宽, 杨绍意, 尚子帅, 姚云峰. 华浙优261在广西不同海拔作早中晚稻种植表现及高产栽培技术[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 106-107.
[14]	郑红明, 郑品卉. 浅析稻谷比价偏低对我国水稻产业的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(4): 32-37.
[15]	严如玉, 甘国渝, 赵希梅, 殷大聪, 李燕丽, 金慧芳, 朱海, 李继福. 我国水稻优势产区生产格局及施肥现状研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(3): 1-8.