中国稻米 ›› 2026, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 37-42.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2026.04.007

• 专论与研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于不同生育期高光谱遥感影像的水稻产量估测模型研究

徐雯1(), 田婷2, 荆培培1, 杨洪建1,*()   

  1. 1 江苏省农业技术推广总站, 南京 210036
    2 苏州市农业科学院/江苏太湖地区农业科学研究所, 江苏 苏州 215106
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-19 出版日期:2026-07-20 发布日期:2026-07-14
  • 通讯作者: 2387131160@qq.com
  • 作者简介:

    第一作者:714877839@qq.com

  • 基金资助:
    江苏省农业重大技术协同推广计划项目(2024-ZYXT-03-1);江苏现代农业产业技术体系建设项目(JATS〔2023〕321);苏州市科技计划项目(SNG2022066)

Rice Yield Estimation Model Research Based on Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Images at Different Growth Stages

XU Wen1(), TIAN Ting2, JING Peipei1, YANG Hongjian1,*()   

  1. 1 Jiangsu Agricultural Technology Extension Station, Nanjing 210036, China
    2 Suzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences/ Taihu Agricultural Research Institute of Jiangsu, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215106, China

摘要:

本研究以不同水稻品种及施氮水平处理的水稻田块作为试验对象,利用无人机高光谱成像系统在水稻分蘖期、拔节孕穗期、抽穗开花期和乳熟期采集冠层高光谱数据。通过提取10个植被指数与8个微分指数共18个光谱参数,并与水稻产量进行相关性分析,筛选出相关性最高的8个光谱参数作为模型输入变量。进而,采用偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)和随机森林(RF)两种机器学习算法分别构建不同生育期的水稻产量预测模型。结果表明,不同生育期水稻产量估测效果存在显著差异,表现为拔节孕穗期>抽穗开花期>乳熟期>分蘖期。其中,拔节孕穗期和抽穗开花期为产量估测的优势生育期。在拔节孕穗期,PLSR模型的预测精度优于RF模型;而在抽穗开花期,RF模型的预测精度则优于PLSR模型。综合来看,在拔节孕穗期采用PLSR模型预测产量效果表现最佳,其验证集决定系数(R2)达0.856,均方根误差(RMSE)为0.970 t/hm2

关键词: 无人机, 高光谱, 机器学习, 水稻, 产量

Abstract:

This study focused on paddy fields with different rice varieties and nitrogen application levels. Canopy hyperspectral data were collected during the tillering, jointing-booting, heading-flowering, and milk ripening stages using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-borne hyperspectral imaging system. A total of 18 spectral parameters, including 10 vegetation indices and 8 differential indices, were extracted and subjected to correlation analysis with rice yield. The eight spectral parameters with the highest correlations were selected as input variables for model construction. Subsequently, two machine learning algorithms, partial least squares regression (PLSR) and random forest (RF), were employed to construct rice yield prediction models for different growth stages, respectively. Results indicated significant differences in rice yield estimation performance across growth stages, ranked as follows: jointing-booting stage>heading-flowering stage>milk ripening stage>tillering stage. Among these, the jointing-booting and heading-flowering stages were identified as the optimal growth stages for yield estimation. At the jointing-booting stage, the PLSR model outperformed the RF model in prediction accuracy; conversely, at the heading-flowering stage, the RF model exhibited superior prediction accuracy compared to the PLSR model. Overall, the PLSR model performed best at the jointing-booting stage, achieving a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.856 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.970 t/hm2 on the validation set.

Key words: unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), hyperspectral, machine learning, rice, yield

中图分类号: